Phase difference between sea level and magnetic reversal rate

Nature ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 329 (6142) ◽  
pp. 816-819 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart Gaffin
Nature ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 336 (6197) ◽  
pp. 317-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. R. RAMPINO

Nature ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 332 (6161) ◽  
pp. 211-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. MULLER ◽  
D. E. MORRIS

1968 ◽  
Vol 46 (10) ◽  
pp. S825-S827
Author(s):  
M. Kodama ◽  
K. Nagashima

Two pieces of experimental evidence, which are inconsistent with the hypothesis of a one-way solar anisotropy as an interpretation of the cosmic-ray diurnal variation, are presented. The diurnal variation of the temperature-corrected meson component at Deep River was examined and compared with that of the neutron component. Both diurnal variations were averaged for each solar rotation from No. 1762 to No. 1787. If a one-way solar anisotropy is assumed, the time of maximum for neutrons should be about half an hour earlier than that for mesons at Deep River. However, the observations show that the phase difference between the two components is the reverse of that expected. Further evidence is obtained from a comparison of the diurnal variation on Mt. Norikura (2 770 m, 11.4 GeV) to that in Itabashi (20 m, 11.5 GeV). According to theoretical calculations based on a one-way solar anisotropy, the time of maximum at high altitude is earlier than or equal to that at sea level, but observations obtained during Dec. 1966 to Mar. 1967 suggest that the opposite is true.


1975 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 395-407
Author(s):  
S. Henriksen

The first question to be answered, in seeking coordinate systems for geodynamics, is: what is geodynamics? The answer is, of course, that geodynamics is that part of geophysics which is concerned with movements of the Earth, as opposed to geostatics which is the physics of the stationary Earth. But as far as we know, there is no stationary Earth – epur sic monere. So geodynamics is actually coextensive with geophysics, and coordinate systems suitable for the one should be suitable for the other. At the present time, there are not many coordinate systems, if any, that can be identified with a static Earth. Certainly the only coordinate of aeronomic (atmospheric) interest is the height, and this is usually either as geodynamic height or as pressure. In oceanology, the most important coordinate is depth, and this, like heights in the atmosphere, is expressed as metric depth from mean sea level, as geodynamic depth, or as pressure. Only for the earth do we find “static” systems in use, ana even here there is real question as to whether the systems are dynamic or static. So it would seem that our answer to the question, of what kind, of coordinate systems are we seeking, must be that we are looking for the same systems as are used in geophysics, and these systems are dynamic in nature already – that is, their definition involvestime.


Eos ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate Wheeling

Researchers identify the main sources of uncertainty in projections of global glacier mass change, which is expected to add about 8–16 centimeters to sea level, through this century.


10.1029/ft354 ◽  
1989 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Dennison ◽  
Edwin J. Anderson ◽  
Jack D. Beuthin ◽  
Edward Cotter ◽  
Richard J. Diecchio ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document