scholarly journals Discordant timing between antennae disrupts sun compass orientation in migratory monarch butterflies

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick A. Guerra ◽  
Christine Merlin ◽  
Robert J. Gegear ◽  
Steven M. Reppert
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myriam Franzke ◽  
Christian Kraus ◽  
Maria Gayler ◽  
David Dreyer ◽  
Keram Pfeiffer ◽  
...  

Insects are well-known for their ability to keep track of their heading direction based on a combination of skylight cues and visual landmarks. This allows them to navigate back to their nest, disperse throughout unfamiliar environments, as well as migrate over large distances between their breeding and non-breeding habitats. The monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) for instance is known for its annual southward migration from North America to certain trees in Central Mexico. To maintain a constant flight route, these butterflies use a time-compensated sun compass for orientation which is processed in a region in the brain, termed the central complex. However, to successfully complete their journey, the butterflies' brain must generate a multitude of orientation strategies, allowing them to dynamically switch from sun-compass orientation to a tactic behavior toward a certain target. To study if monarch butterflies exhibit different orientation modes and if they can switch between them, we observed the orientation behavior of tethered flying butterflies in a flight simulator while presenting different visual cues to them. We found that the butterflies' behavior depended on the presented visual stimulus. Thus, while a dark stripe was used for flight stabilization, a bright stripe was fixated by the butterflies in their frontal visual field. If we replaced a bright stripe by a simulated sun stimulus, the butterflies switched their orientation behavior and exhibited compass orientation. Taken together, our data show that monarch butterflies rely on and switch between different orientation modes, allowing them to adjust orientation to the actual behavioral demands of the animal.


Science ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 325 (5948) ◽  
pp. 1700-1704 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Merlin ◽  
R. J. Gegear ◽  
S. M. Reppert

1992 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 321-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis E. Levin ◽  
Pedro Belmonte ◽  
Olga González

1969 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 636-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Phillip Goodyear ◽  
Denzel E. Ferguson

2007 ◽  
Vol 104 (18) ◽  
pp. 7471-7476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dora Biro ◽  
Robin Freeman ◽  
Jessica Meade ◽  
Stephen Roberts ◽  
Tim Guilford

How do birds orient over familiar terrain? In the best studied avian species, the homing pigeon (Columba livia), two apparently independent primary mechanisms are currently debated: either memorized visual landmarks provide homeward guidance directly, or birds rely on a compass to home from familiar locations. Using miniature Global Positioning System tracking technology and clock-shift procedures, we set sun-compass and landmark information in conflict, showing that experienced birds can accurately complete their memorized routes by using landmarks alone. Nevertheless, we also find that route following is often consistently offset in the expected compass direction, faithfully reproducing the shape of the track, but in parallel. Thus, we demonstrate conditions under which compass orientation and landmark guidance must be combined into a system of simultaneous or oscillating dual control.


Nature ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 387 (6628) ◽  
pp. 29-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra M. Perez ◽  
Orley R. Taylor ◽  
Rudolf Jander

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document