scholarly journals A robust method for automatic identification of femoral landmarks, axes, planes and bone coordinate systems using surface models

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maximilian C. M. Fischer ◽  
Sonja A. G. A. Grothues ◽  
Juliana Habor ◽  
Matías de la Fuente ◽  
Klaus Radermacher

AbstractThe identification of femoral landmarks is a common procedure in multiple academic fields. Femoral bone coordinate systems are used particularly in orthopedics and biomechanics, and are defined by landmarks, axes and planes. A fully automatic detection overcomes the drawbacks of a labor-intensive manual identification. In this paper, a new automatic atlas- and a priori knowledge-based approach that processes femoral surface models, called the A&A method, was evaluated. The A&A method is divided in two stages. Firstly, a single atlas-based registration maps landmarks and areas from a template surface to the subject. In the second stage, landmarks, axes and planes that are used to construct several femoral bone coordinate systems are refined using a priori knowledge. Three common femoral coordinate systems are defined by the landmarks detected. The A&A method proved to be very robust against a variation of the spatial alignment of the surface models. The results of the A&A method and a manual identification were compared. No significant rotational differences existed for the bone coordinate system recommended by the International Society of Biomechanics. Minor significant differences of maximally 0.5° were observed for the two other coordinate systems. This might be clinically irrelevant, depending on the context of use and should, therefore, be evaluated by the potential user regarding the specific application. The entire source code of the A&A method and the data used in the study is open source and can be accessed via https://github.com/RWTHmediTEC/FemoralCoordinateSystem.

Author(s):  
Yusuke Nakajima ◽  
Syoji Kobashi ◽  
Yohei Tsumori ◽  
Nao Shibanuma ◽  
Fumiaki Imamura ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 77 (14) ◽  
pp. 17889-17911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sai Ma ◽  
Xianfeng Zhao ◽  
Qingxiao Guan ◽  
Zhoujun Xu ◽  
Yi Ma

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 (7) ◽  
pp. 16-21
Author(s):  
Sai Ma ◽  
Xianfeng Zhao ◽  
Qingxiao Guan ◽  
Chengduo Zhao

Philosophy ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Giaquinto

AbstractThis paper presents considerations against the linguistic view of a priori knowledge. The paper has two parts. In the first part I argue that problems about the individuation of lexical meanings provide evidence for a moderate indeterminacy, as distinct from the radical indeterminacy of meaning claimed by Quine, and that this undermines the idea of a priori knowledge based on knowledge of synonymies. In the second part of the paper I argue against the idea that a priori knowledge not based on knowledge of synonymies can be explained in terms of implicit definitions.1


2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (17) ◽  
pp. 6863-6876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bindi Chen ◽  
Peter C. Matthews ◽  
Peter J. Tavner

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 726-745 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Fidler ◽  
Markus Grasmair ◽  
Otmar Scherzer

2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (10) ◽  
pp. 9466-9477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Zhang ◽  
Guohui Tian ◽  
Jiaxing Lu ◽  
Mengyang Zhang ◽  
Senyan Zhang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document