Low-Frequency Hearing and the Auditory Brainstem Response

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 11-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Stapells
1988 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 171-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Laukli ◽  
O. Fjermedal ◽  
I. W. S. Mair

1992 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 167-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia G. Fowler

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effects of stimulus phase on the latencies and morphology of the auditory brainstem response (ABR) of normal-hearing subjects. Although click stimuli produced equivalent ABR latencies for the rarefaction and condensation phases, the subtraction of the waveforms from the two phases yielded a difference potential. Tone pip stimuli produced polarity differences that were inversely related to stimulus frequency: the higher the frequency, the smaller the ABR latency differences between responses to rarefaction and condensation stimuli, and the smaller the difference potentials. Thus, whereas the latency of click-evoked ABR is dominated by high-frequency responses with equivalent latencies regardless of stimulus phase, low-frequency responses contribute to the overall morphology of the ABR that yields the phasic difference potential. The implications of these findings are discussed with reference to subjects with high-frequency hearing losses.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara C. Therrien ◽  
Catherine E. Carr ◽  
Elizabeth F. Brittan-Powell ◽  
Alicia M. Wells-Berlin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document