Use of the collagen-binding assay for von Willebrand factor 
in the analysis of type 2M von Willebrand disease: 
a comparison with the ristocetin cofactor assay

2002 ◽  
Vol 116 (1) ◽  
pp. 187-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne F. Riddell ◽  
P. Vincent Jenkins ◽  
Ioana C. Nitu-Whalley ◽  
Angus H. McCraw ◽  
Christine A. Lee ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 03 (01) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Emmanuel J Favaloro ◽  

The identification and functional characterisation of von Willebrand disease (VWD) is challenging due to clinical uncertainty and limitations in test processes and panels used by laboratories, and because the classification scheme does not always permit unequivocal assignment of subtype. This article reviews contemporary alternatives to classic diagnostic approaches, including the incorporation of extended core test panels inclusive of the collagen-binding assay and the potential for desmopressin (DDAVP) challenge not only to provide therapeutic information but also to assist the better characterisation of individuals with defects or deficiencies in von Willebrand factor (VWF). Supplementary assays such as the PFA-100® and the VWF propeptide assay following DDAVP challenge are also worth considering.


2000 ◽  
Vol 84 (09) ◽  
pp. 401-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.A. Dean ◽  
V. S. Blanchette ◽  
M. D. Carcao ◽  
A. M. Stain ◽  
C. R. Sparling ◽  
...  

SummaryDefinitive diagnosis of type 1 von Willebrand Disease (VWD) remains a problem. Provisional consensus guidelines for the diagnosis of definite and possible type 1 VWD were prepared by the Scientific Subcommittee on von Willebrand factor (VWF) of the Scientific and Standardization Committee (SSC) of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) during the 1996 annual meeting for the specific purpose of further evaluation in retrospective and prospective studies by a Working Party on Diagnostic Criteria (1996 Annual Report of the SSC/ISTH Subcommittee on VWF). In the first phase of this study, we compared 2 definitions of type 1 VWD, each with 3 criteria: significant bleeding history, laboratory investigations, and family history. Using the ISTH consensus guidelines for type 1 VWD definition, significantly fewer patients were diagnosed with definite type 1 disease as compared to our “in house” Hospital for Sick Children (HSC) criteria (4 vs. 31). While we recognize that the provisional ISTH consensus guidelines were not intended for clinical use, we believe that the results of our studies are of interest and will assist in any future refinements to the ISTH guidelines.In the second phase of this study, we investigated the utility of 2 new tests, a laboratory screening test and a functional test, for VWD in our well characterized, pediatric-based population. The Platelet Function Analyzer (PFA-100®) provides an in vitro measure of primary hemostasis under conditions of high shear, using disposable cartridges containing collagen and either epinephrine or ADP. All tested subjects with types 2 or 3 VWD had prolonged PFA-100 closure times (CTs) with both cartridge types (n = 17) and prolonged bleeding times (n = 14). In subjects with definite type 1 VWD, 20/24 (83%) had prolonged CTs with the collagen/ADP cartridge (19/24 (79%) with collagen/epinephrine), compared with 7/26 (27%) with prolonged bleeding times. In subjects with definite types 1, 2, or 3 VWD, collagen/ADP CTs were abnormal in 37/41 subjects, giving an overall sensitivity of 90%. With this high sensitivity, the PFA-100 is a better screening test for VWD than the bleeding time.We also tested a VWF collagen-binding assay (VWF:CBA) as a functional test for VWF, in comparison with the more routinely-used ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RCo). The VWF:CBA is based on an ELISA technique, which has the potential to be more reproducible than the VWF:RCo. We found that the VWF:CBA detected 43/49 (88%) subjects with definite types 1, 2, or 3 VWD, performing as well as the VWF:RCo, that detected 42/48 (88%). We also showed that, used in conjunction with VWF antigen levels, the VWF:CBA may be useful in classification of VWD subtypes.


2010 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1009-1021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Favaloro

SummaryThis study reports on the evaluation of seven commercial von Wille-brand factor (VWF) collagen binding (VWF:CB) assays to potentially assist the discrimination of types 1 and 2 von Willebrand disease (VWD). Samples from 25 patients with type 1 VWD, of varying severity, were co-tested with 16 samples from patients with types 2A or 2B VWD, plus various control samples, using each commercial VWF:CB assay assessed against our standard (reference) in-house VWF:CB assay, as well as our in-house VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) and ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) assays. Commercial VWF:CB assays varied in their ability to discriminate types 1 and 2A/2B VWD. The optimal VWF:CB/VWF:Ag ratio at which optimal discrimination occurred also differed between assays, with some improvements observed with some (but not all) as-says following a harmonisation process that aimed to correct for different calibrator effects. Assay variability also compromised assay utility in some test occasions. Future standardisation and improvements in some commercial VWF:CB assays are needed before the VWF:CB assay can be more fully and globally utilised for discrimination of VWD types in diagnostic laboratories.


2009 ◽  
Vol 02 ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
Emmanuel J Favaloro ◽  

The identification and functional characterization of von Willebrand disease (VWD) is challenging due to clinical uncertainty and limitations in test processes and panels used by laboratories, and because the classification scheme does not always permit unequivocal assignment of subtype. This article reviews contemporary alternatives to classic diagnostic approaches, including the incorporation of extended core test panels inclusive of the collagen-binding assay, and the potential for desmopressin (DDAVP) challenges not only to provide therapeutic information but also to assist the better characterization of individuals with defects or deficiencies in von Willebrand factor (VWF). Supplementary assays such as the PFA-100® and the VWF propeptide assay following DDAVP challenge are also worth considering.


2006 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 2088-2090 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. BARONCIANI ◽  
A. B. FEDERICI ◽  
G. COZZI ◽  
M. T. CANCIANI ◽  
P. M. MANNUCCI

1997 ◽  
Vol 78 (02) ◽  
pp. 930-933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping Chang ◽  
D L Aronson

SummaryFive plasma preparations (11 lots) used in the treatment of von Willebrand’s disease (vWD) were evaluated. The collagen binding function of von Willebrand factor (vWF) containing preparations was compared with the ristocetin cofactor activity and the vWF antigen. Some preparations have higher ratio of functional activity (ristocetin cofactor and collagen binding) relative to the antigen than is found in normal plasma. The ristocetin cofactor activity and the collagen binding activity are tightly correlated (r = .95). Ultracentrifugal (UCF) analysis was used to compare the size distribution of vWf antigen, ristocetin cofactor and collagen binding activity. The sedimentation of all of the vWF parameters in the plasma products was slower than in plasma. In plasma products the ristocetin cofactor activity sediments the most rapidly, the collagen binding activity is slower and the antigen the slowest. The collagen/antigen ratio decreases with decreasing vWF size. Assignment of potency to vWF containing preparations utilizing the collagen binding activity may be more precise and as accurate as with the traditional ristocetin cofactor assay.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document