In vivo dosimetry for head and neck carcinoma: determination of target absorbed dose from entrance and exit absorbed dose measurements

2011 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 11001
Author(s):  
L. Farhat ◽  
M. Besbes ◽  
A. Bridier ◽  
J. Daoud
2004 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 143-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Appleyard ◽  
K. Ball ◽  
F. E. Hughes ◽  
W. Kilby ◽  
R. Nicholls ◽  
...  

Purpose: Having previously reviewed the implementation of systematic in vivo dosimetry at the Norfolk and Norwich Hospital this paper examines the results of entrance dose measurements for specific sites/techniques and determines whether different action/alert protocols are required for these different categories.Methods and materials: Entrance dose measurements using p-type diodes were analysed for the following treatment categories: Breast, head and neck in beam direction shell, abdomino-pelvic and intrathoracic. A 4% tolerance was applied.Results: Mean deviations from expected dose and proportion of measurements exceeding tolerance were: Breast: +1.15%±3.04% (1SD), 238/1073≥4%; Head and neck: +0.35%±2.20% (1SD), 21/326≥4%; Abdomino-pelvic: +0.52%±2.75% (1SD), 93/712≥4%; Intrathoracic: −0.01%±2.75% (1SD), 22/119≥4%. Significant improvements in results for breast patients were noted following the introduction of a commercial breast board. The results for abdomino-pelvic patients confirmed a substantial variation in diode response under short FSD, wedged fields at 16MV (that had not been corrected for). The statistical uncertainty in dose measurement for each treatment category was calculated in order to assist determination of appropriate tolerance levels.Conclusions: A blanket tolerance of 4% was generally too low given the extent of measurement uncertainty. The relatively high number of readings outside tolerance where identification of errors was difficult/impossible resulted in inconsistent application of the action protocol. Some widening of tolerances is likely to improve quality of procedure and treatment. Appropriate action levels are recommended for each treatment category.


Author(s):  
GABRIEL ÁLVARES BORGES ◽  
DANIELA FORTUNATO RÊGO ◽  
DANIELE XAVIER ASSAD ◽  
RICARDO DELLA COLETTA ◽  
GRAZIELA DE LUCA CANTO ◽  
...  

1983 ◽  
Vol 95 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 371-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. P. Zenner ◽  
I. F. Herrmann ◽  
W. Bremer ◽  
C. Stahl-Mauge

2001 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 314-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Reuther ◽  
Alexander C. Kübler ◽  
Uwe Zillmann ◽  
Christa Flechtenmacher ◽  
Hannsjörg Sinn

1996 ◽  
Vol 106 (8) ◽  
pp. 972-976 ◽  
Author(s):  
David D. Hamlar ◽  
David E. Schuller ◽  
Reinhard A. Gahbauer ◽  
Robert A. Buerki ◽  
Alfred E. Staubus ◽  
...  

1990 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Leunens ◽  
J. Van Dam ◽  
A. Dutreix ◽  
E. van der Schueren

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomasz Kubiak

AbstractThe electron paramagnetic resonance measurements of dosimetric signals originating from radicals generated under the influence of ionizing radiation allow to determine the dose absorbed by the casualties of radiation accidents. The study material can consist of victim’s teeth, bones or nails. Also human hair and mineral glass from personal electronic devices, that people had in the moment of accident, are considered to be useful in dosimetry. Although X-band (9.4 GHz) spectrometers predominate, Q-band devices (34 GHz) enable to increase the sensitivity of measurements and reduce the size of specimens, whereas L-band machines (1.1 GHz) are suitable for in vivo dosimetry. The EPR tooth enamel dosimetry has been used many times to assess the cumulative radiation dose and health risk in people living in areas contaminated due to the radiation accidents and to determine the unknown absorbed doses in patients after the overexposures during radiotherapy treatment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 101098
Author(s):  
Christopher Montemagno ◽  
Benjamin Serrano ◽  
Jérôme Durivault ◽  
Valérie Nataf ◽  
François Mocquot ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document