System Effects in Low-carbon Electricity Systems

Author(s):  
M. Thierry Dujardin
Author(s):  
Qi Zhang ◽  
Tetsuo Tezuka ◽  
Benjamin C. Mclellan ◽  
Keiichi N. Ishihara

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 1098-1109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danny Pudjianto ◽  
Marko Aunedi ◽  
Predrag Djapic ◽  
Goran Strbac

2018 ◽  
Vol 228 ◽  
pp. 928-941 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Price ◽  
Marianne Zeyringer ◽  
Dennis Konadu ◽  
Zenaida Sobral Mourão ◽  
Andy Moore ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 47 (16) ◽  
pp. 9053-9060 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Mileva ◽  
James H. Nelson ◽  
Josiah Johnston ◽  
Daniel M. Kammen

2020 ◽  
Vol 280 ◽  
pp. 115948
Author(s):  
Yunqi Wang ◽  
Jing Qiu ◽  
Yuechuan Tao ◽  
Xian Zhang ◽  
Guibin Wang

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012.22 (0) ◽  
pp. _3106-1_-_3106-10_
Author(s):  
Yusuke KISHITA ◽  
Naoto KURAHASHI ◽  
Yohei YAMAGUCHI ◽  
Shinichi FUKUSHIGE ◽  
Yasushi UMEDA

Author(s):  
Geoffrey P Hammond ◽  
Áine O’Grady

Internationally, there has been a move by nations to decarbonise their electricity systems in an effort to tackle rising territorial emissions. No consensus has been fully reached on best approach, which has led to significant divergence in energy policy between countries and a consequential lack of long-term clarity. Additionally, recent UK policy failures, in terms of stimulating greater energy efficiency and encouraging energy innovation, highlight the huge challenge involved in developing and achieving a low carbon future. Steps to decarbonise electricity whilst also providing a secure and affordable supply, can lead to varying life-cycle environmental consequences. A UK research consortium developed three pathways to explore this move to a more electric low carbon future out to 2050. These pathways have been previously evaluated in terms of their life-cycle energy and environmental performance within a wider sustainability framework. Over the course of the project, greater understanding of the generation technologies and the functionality of the overall system under the different regimes were gained. Here, the environmental consequences of the most recent version of the pathways are presented on a life-cycle basis from ‘cradle-to-gate.’ Thus, the environmental impact of technological trends in UK energy policy and their effect on the pathways are explored through a series of sensitivity analyses. The three UK energy futures incorporating ‘disruptive’ technological options were examined based on the phase out of coal use in favour of gas-fired power, ranging penetration levels of carbon capture and storage, and the allocation and fuel type used for combined heat and power. Recommendations are proposed to help frame future energy policy choices in order to limit the environmental consequences of future electricity systems.


2017 ◽  
Vol 201 ◽  
pp. 111-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avinash Vijay ◽  
Nicolas Fouquet ◽  
Iain Staffell ◽  
Adam Hawkes

Author(s):  
Nick Eyre ◽  
Sarah J. Darby ◽  
Philipp Grünewald ◽  
Eoghan McKenna ◽  
Rebecca Ford

A 1.5°C global average target implies that we should no longer focus on merely incremental emissions reductions from the electricity system, but rather on fundamentally re-envisaging a system that, sooner rather than later, becomes carbon free. Many low-carbon technologies are surpassing mainstream predictions for both uptake and cost reduction. Their deployment is beginning to be disruptive within established systems. ‘Smart technologies’ are being developed to address emerging challenges of system integration, but their rates of future deployment remain uncertain. We argue that transition towards a system that can fully displace carbon generation sources will require expanding the focus of our efforts beyond technical solutions. Recognizing that change has social and technical dimensions, and that these interact strongly, we set out a socio-technical review that covers electricity infrastructure, citizens, business models and governance. It describes some of the socio-technical challenges that need to be addressed for the successful transition of the existing electricity systems. We conclude that a socio-technical understanding of electricity system transitions offers new and better insights into the potential and challenges for rapid decarbonization. This article is part of the theme issue ‘The Paris Agreement: understanding the physical and social challenges for a warming world of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels'.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document