Technical Note A New Arthroscopic Method for Reconstructing the Anterior and Posterior Cruciate Ligaments Using a Single-Incision Technique: Simultaneous Grafting of the Autogenous Semitendinosus and Patellar Tendons

1999 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 871-876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunio Hara ◽  
Toshikazu Kubo ◽  
Choji Shimizu ◽  
Takehiko Suginoshita ◽  
Ginjiro Minami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Incision ◽  
Technical Note ◽  
Cruciate Ligaments ◽  
Incision Technique

Patient-oriented functional outcome after repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures using a single-incision technique

2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 302-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D. McKee ◽  
Rahim Hirji ◽  
Emil H. Schemitsch ◽  
Lisa M. Wild ◽  
James P. Waddell
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Biceps Tendon ◽  
Distal Biceps Tendon ◽  
Distal Biceps ◽  
Tendon Ruptures ◽  
Incision Technique

Abstract No. 23: Single Incision Technique for Tunneled Central Venous Access

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. S10-S11
Author(s):  
S.G. Contractor ◽  
T.D. Phatak ◽  
N. Bhagat ◽  
J.W. Mitchell
Keyword(s):  
Single Incision ◽  
Central Venous Access ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Incision Technique

scholarly journals Single-incision technique for the internal fixation of distal fractures of the tibia and fibula: a combined anatomic and clinical study

2013 ◽  
Vol 133 (12) ◽  
pp. 1631-1637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baoqing Yu ◽  
Gan Huang ◽  
Josiah T. George ◽  
Wenrui Li ◽  
Sihua Pan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Study ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Incision Technique

scholarly journals REINSERTION OF THE DISTAL TENDON OF A BICEPS USING ENDOBUTTON FROM A SINGLE INCISION TECHNIQUE

2020 ◽  
pp. 75-86
Author(s):  
V.G. Lutsyshyn ◽  
V.M. Maiko ◽  
O.V. Maiko ◽  
M.O. Romanov
Keyword(s):  
Single Incision ◽  
Biceps Tendon ◽  
Functional Results ◽  
Distal Biceps Tendon ◽  
Distal Biceps ◽  
Correct Sequence ◽  
Incision Technique ◽  
The One ◽  
Radial Tuberosity ◽  
Distal Tendon

Summary. Surgical treatment of biceps distal tendon ruptures shows better functional results, compared to a conservative treatment. Recently, the one-incision surgical technique is becoming more and more popular. Task of the study: representation of a technique to recover a distal biceps tendon with a single incision and fixation with an Endobutton. Materials and methods: the single-incision technique for a distal biceps tendon recovery comprises of several steps: an incision place and layer-wise access, preparation of the distal biceps tendon, preparation of the radial tuberosity, fixation of the tendon. Results. The knowledge of anatomy and the correct sequence of steps in the single-incision technique with the fixation of a tendon with Endobutton (by ChM) makes the recovery of distal biceps tendon efficient, reliable, and, what is more important, safe.

scholarly journals First Canadian experience with robotic single-incision pyeloplasty: Comparison with multi-incision technique

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Law ◽  
Neal Rowe ◽  
Jason Archambault ◽  
Sofia Nastis ◽  
Alp Sener ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Incision ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Access Port ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Site Access ◽  
Da Vinci Robotic System ◽  
Incision Technique

<p><strong>Introduction:</strong> We compared the outcomes of single-incision, robotassisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty vs. multiple-incision pyeloplasty using the da Vinci robotic system.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> We reviewed all consecutive robotic pyeloplasties by a single surgeon from January 2011 to August 2015. A total of 30 procedures were performed (16 single:14 multi-port). Two different single-port devices were compared: the GelPort (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA) and the Intuitive single-site access port (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA).</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> Patient demographics were similar between the two groups. Mean operating time was similar among the single and multi-port groups (225.2 min vs. 198.9 minutes [p=0.33]). There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay in either group (86.2 hr vs. 93.2 hr [p=0.76]). There was no difference in success rates or postoperative complications among groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Single-port robotic pyeloplasty is non-inferior to multiple-incision robotic surgery in terms of operative times, hospitalization time, success rates, and complications. Verifying these results with larger cohorts is required prior to the wide adoption of this technique. Ongoing objective measurements of cosmesis and patient satisfaction are being evaluated.</p><p> </p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document