Correction of Severe Foot and Ankle Contracture Due to CRPS Using External Fixation and Pain Management: Report of a Pediatric Case

2008 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 434-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W. Mendicino ◽  
Chul Kim ◽  
Abraham J. Kabazie ◽  
Alan R. Catanzariti
2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (11) ◽  
pp. 1065-1070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Dalla Paola ◽  
Tanja Ceccacci ◽  
Sasa Ninkovic ◽  
Sara Sorgentone ◽  
Maria Grazia Marinescu

2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 522-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Ettinger ◽  
Christian Plaass ◽  
Leif Claassen ◽  
Christina Stukenborg-Colsman ◽  
Daiwei Yao ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 485-486
Author(s):  
Bradley M. Lamm ◽  
Shawn C. Standard ◽  
Ian J. Galley ◽  
John E. Herzenberg ◽  
Dror Paley

Author(s):  
Nicole K. Cates ◽  
John D. Miller ◽  
Shirley Chen ◽  
Vineela M. Ayyagari ◽  
Nathan N. O'Hara ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0022
Author(s):  
Arianna L. Gianakos ◽  
Filippo Romanelli ◽  
Malaka Badri ◽  
Naina Rao ◽  
Bart Lubberts ◽  
...  

Category: Ankle; Other Introduction/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of the current literature assessing the management of pain with various block techniques in the perioperative period during elective foot and ankle surgery. Methods: A review of the literature was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched on October 1, 2019. Studies were identified by using synonyms for ‘foot’, ‘ankle’, ‘pain management’, ‘opioid’ and ‘nerve block’. Inclusion criteria were studies that 1) reported and compared the outcomes following various types of peripheral nerve blocks in in foot and ankle surgery, 2) were published in the English language, and 3) were published within the last 10 years. Results: Twenty-four articles evaluating 4,640 patients were included. Sixty-seven percent were randomized controlled trials, 17% were prospective comparison studies, and 17% were retrospective comparison studies. Nerve block techniques included: femoral, adductor canal, sciatic, popliteal, saphenous, and ankle. Ropivacaine and bupivacaine were most commonly utilized. Postoperative opioid consumption and postoperative pain levels were reduced with use of PNB when compared with systemic/local anesthesia, in patients receiving combined popliteal/femoral block, and in patients receiving continuous infusion popliteal block [Table 1, Table 2]. Studies demonstrated higher satisfaction with PNB, continuous infusion, and dual injections [Table 3]. One study reported 7% neurologic related complication risk and demonstrated a higher complication rate when with popliteal versus ankle block. All other studies were equivocal or failed to mention complications. Conclusion: Optimal pain management for elective foot and ankle surgery remains controversial and an ideal protocol from a risk-benefit perspective regarding use of PNB has yet to be established. Our study demonstrates improvements in postoperative pain levels, opioid consumption, and length of stay in patients receiving a PNB when compared with systemic anesthesia. Combined PNB and dual catheter administration may improve outcomes. Unfortunately, little data has been published on risks and tradeoffs in order to help guide patients and surgeons with a well informed shared decision making model. Future studies are needed to better clarify any respective tradeoffs to these options. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document