An innovative Weight-Bearing Device for Weight-Bearing Three-Dimensional Imaging for Foot and Ankle Surgery Pre-operative Planning

Author(s):  
J Ferràs-Tarragó ◽  
E Grau-Llopis ◽  
E Navarrete-Faubel ◽  
M Sánchez-González ◽  
V Vicent-Carsí
2021 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 177-184
Author(s):  
Alexandre Leme Godoy-Santos ◽  
Alessio Bernasconi ◽  
Marcelo Bordalo-Rodrigues ◽  
François Lintz ◽  
Carlos Felipe Teixeira Lôbo ◽  
...  

Abstract Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been applied in dentistry and medicine for nearly two decades. Its application in the foot and ankle specialty has grown exponentially in recent years. Weight-bearing CBCT allows clinicians to obtain weight-bearing images that can be viewed in all three planes and to construct three-dimensional models, similar to those constructed from traditional CT scans, as well as exposing patients to less radiation than do traditional CT scans. This technology has revolutionized diagnoses, improving the understanding of various lesions and surgical planning in the foot and ankle specialty. Ongoing studies of the use of weight-bearing CBCT in foot and ankle surgery are focused on fully automated and semi-automated three-dimensional measurements, as well as bone segmentation, mapping of the distances/orientation of the joints, and the production of customized implants. The aims of this review article are to show the evolution of this emerging tool in the foot and ankle specialty, to update those in related specialties on its use in current clinical practice, and to indicate where the research community is heading.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0006
Author(s):  
Matthias Peiffer ◽  
C. Belvedere ◽  
S. Clockaerts ◽  
T. Leenders ◽  
Alexej Barg ◽  
...  

Category: Hindfoot Introduction/Purpose: An adult-acquired flatfoot deformity is a three-dimensional (3D) condition characterized by a loss of the medial longitudinal arch, valgus alignment of the hindfoot, and abduction of the midfoot. When conservative measures are not sufficient, a medializing calcaneal osteotomy (MCO) is frequently performed to correct the deformity, but there is lack of data on the associated three-dimensional variables defining the final correction. A possible reason for this shortcoming could be the current image-based analyses, mainly performed on bi-dimensional radiographs. These are hampered by errors in 3D rotations and superimposition of bony structures. The aim of this study was therefore to assess the correlation between the preoperative hindfoot valgus deformity and calcaneal osteotomy angle and the postoperative calcaneal displacement by use of weightbearing CT (WBCT). Methods: Weight-bearing CT scans obtained pre- and post-operatively were analyzed for sixteen patients with a mean age of 49.4 years (range: 18-66 years). Indication for surgery was adult-acquired flat foot deformity stage II. Based on the WBCT images, pre- and post-operative 3D bone morphological models of the tibia, talus, calcaneus, and the second metatarsal were created, on which anatomical bony landmarks were computationally identified to define a Foot Anatomical reference Frame (FAF). This FAF was used to measure valgus deformity pre- and post-operatively, inclination of the osteotomy plane, and displacement of the calcaneus (Fig. 1). Linear regression was conducted to assess the relationship between these measurements. Results: On average, the hindfoot valgus changed from 13.1° (±4.6) preoperatively to 5.7° (±4.3) postoperatively. A mean inferior displacement of 3.2 mm (±1.3) was observed along the osteotomy with a mean inclination angle of 54.6° (±5.6), 80.5° (±10.7), - 13.7° (±15.7) in the axial, sagittal and coronal planes, respectively. A statistically significant positive relationship (P < .05, R2 = 0.6) was found between the preoperative valgus, the axial osteotomy inclination, and the inferior displacement. Conclusion: This study shows that the degree of preoperative valgus of the hindfoot and the axial osteotomy angle are predictive factors for the amount of postoperative plantar displacement of the calcaneus. These findings contrast the general recommendation of performing a 90° calcaneal osteotomy angle, i.e. perpendicular to the lateral calcaneal wall in every patient. The obtained factors should be taken into account when performing a MCO and could be integrated in a computer-based pre- operative planning.


2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 259-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martinus Richter ◽  
Jens Geerling ◽  
Stefan Zech ◽  
Thomas Goesling ◽  
Christian Krettek

2020 ◽  
pp. 193864002098091
Author(s):  
Akhil Sharma ◽  
Kyle S. Kirkland ◽  
Robert M. Holloway ◽  
Selene G. Parekh

Three-dimensional (3D) printing has greatly benefited medicine, manufacturing vital organs like skin, hearts, kidneys, and livers. Early studies on 3D printing in surgery have consistently reported decreased operative time and improved precision. This technology has gained popularity with orthopaedic surgeons in knee, hip, and shoulder surgeries because 3D printing is associated with enhancing osseointegration. However, this innovation is still not commonly used among foot and ankle surgeons; one reason is that whereas the literature on 3D printing–assisted surgery is populated with studies on operative techniques and clinical outcomes, there exists an ambiguity on how to incorporate this feature into the clinic. Thus, the aim of this technology column is to consolidate and standardize a workflow to guide foot and ankle surgeons on integrating 3D printing into one’s practice. We describe a model developed by a single surgeon at one institution who directs a large caseload of 3D-printed foot and ankle surgeries. From the initial patient visit to the interaction between the surgeon and the implant engineering team, to documentation of data adding to the preliminary literature, this work has great implications on streamlining the assimilation of a highly successful technology to improve foot and ankle surgery for both surgeons and patients. Level of Evidence: Level V


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 2473011416S0008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grigory Gershkovich ◽  
Dillon Arango ◽  
Gene W. Shaffer ◽  
Anthony Ndu

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (14) ◽  
pp. e595-e603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew S. Conti ◽  
Scott J. Ellis

2009 ◽  
Vol 267 (4) ◽  
pp. 557-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio Storck ◽  
Philipp Juergens ◽  
Claude Fischer ◽  
Olivia Haenni ◽  
Franz Ebner ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document