laryngeal framework surgery
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

65
(FIVE YEARS 9)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2022 ◽  
pp. 019459982110728
Author(s):  
Michael Coulter ◽  
Kastley Marvin ◽  
Matthew Brigger ◽  
Christopher M. Johnson

Objective To assess dysphagia outcomes following surgical management of unilateral vocal fold immobility (UVFI) in adults. Data Sources Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central. Review Methods A structured literature search was utilized, and a 2-researcher systematic review was performed following PRISMA guidelines. Extractable data were pooled, and a quantitative analysis was performed with a random effects model to analyze treatment outcome and complications by procedure. Results A total of 416 publications were screened and 26 met inclusion criteria. Subjects encompassed 959 patients with UVFI who underwent 916 procedures (n = 547, injection laryngoplasty; n = 357, laryngeal framework surgery; n = 12, laryngeal reinnervation). An overall 615 were identified as having dysphagia as a result of UVFI and had individually extractable outcome data, which served as the basis for a quantitative meta-analysis. In general, dysphagia outcomes after all medialization procedures were strongly positive. Quantitative analysis demonstrated a success rate estimate of 90% (95% CI, 75%-100%) for injection laryngoplasty and 92% (95% CI, 87%-97%) for laryngeal framework surgery. The estimated complication rate was 7% (95% CI, 2%-13%) for injection laryngoplasty and 15% (95% CI, 10%-20%) for laryngeal framework surgery, with minor complications predominating. Although laryngeal reinnervation could not be assessed quantitatively due to low numbers, qualitative analysis demonstrated consistent benefit for a majority of patients for each procedure. Conclusion Dysphagia due to UVFI can be improved in a majority of patients with surgical procedures intended to improve glottal competence, with a low risk of complications. Injection laryngoplasty and laryngeal framework surgery appear to be efficacious and safe, and laryngeal reinnervation may be a promising new option for select patients.


Author(s):  
Stephanie D. Mes ◽  
Martine Hendriksma ◽  
Bas J. Heijnen ◽  
Ben F. J. Goudsmit ◽  
Jeroen C. Jansen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Garber ◽  
Grace M. Wandell ◽  
Theodore A. Gobillot ◽  
Al Merati ◽  
Neel K. Bhatt ◽  
...  

HNO ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Hess ◽  
Susanne Fleischer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth S. Burckardt ◽  
Gerardo Lopez‐Guerra ◽  
James B. Kobler ◽  
Monica A. Tynan ◽  
Robert H. Petrillo ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 151-154
Author(s):  
Guilherme Simas do Amaral Catani ◽  
Maria Eduarda Carvalho Catani ◽  
Letícia Raysa Schiavon Kinasz ◽  
Gabriela Alves Marroni ◽  
Marcelly Botelho Soares ◽  
...  

Laryngeal framework surgery is defined as surgical procedures performed on the laryngeal skeleton and the insertion of muscles to correct vocal fold positioning and tension. Its main objective is to improve the voice without directly intervening in the vocal folds. The European Society of Laryngology proposed in 2000 a classification and nomenclature of these surgeries according to their purpose. Such standardization has divided these procedures into four groups: Approximation laryngoplasty, Expansion laryngoplasty, Relaxation laryngoplasty, and Tensioning laryngoplasty. Indications, techniques, and complications of each procedure will be described in this review.


2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 168-168
Author(s):  
I. Tateya ◽  
N. Hiwatashi ◽  
Y. Kishimoto ◽  
K. Omori

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document