Appropriate Use Criteria for the Treatment of Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Review of the 2017 American College of Cardiology Guideline for the Cardiac Anesthesiologist

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (11) ◽  
pp. 3127-3142
Author(s):  
Josh Zimmerman ◽  
Nate Birgenheier
2017 ◽  
Vol 70 (20) ◽  
pp. 2566-2598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert O. Bonow ◽  
Alan S. Brown ◽  
Linda D. Gillam ◽  
Samir R. Kapadia ◽  
Clifford J. Kavinsky ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert O. Bonow ◽  
Alan S. Brown ◽  
Linda D. Gillam ◽  
Samir R. Kapadia ◽  
Clifford J. Kavinsky ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 182
Author(s):  
Fotios A. Mitropoulos ◽  
Meletios A. Kanakis ◽  
Sotiria C. Apostolopoulou ◽  
Spyridon Rammos ◽  
Constantine E. Anagnostopoulos

<p>Mechanical and biological prostheses are valid options when aortic valve replacement is necessary. The Ross procedure is also an alternative solution, especially for young patients.</p><p>We describe the case of a young patient with congenital aortic stenosis and bicuspid aortic valve who presented with dyspnea on exertion. An open commissurotomy was performed, and within 8 months the patient developed recurrent symptoms of severe aortic stenosis. He underwent redo sternotomy and a Ross-Konno procedure with an uneventful recovery.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document