Acute total hip replacement combined with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for the management of acetabular fracture in the elderly

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 293-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Marcantonio ◽  
Richard Iorio ◽  
Lawrence M. Specht ◽  
Michael S. Kain
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Acetabular Fracture ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Open Reduction Internal Fixation ◽  
Total Hip

Total Hip Replacement Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures

2012 ◽  
Vol 94 (21) ◽  
pp. 1921-1928 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghazi Khalil Chammout ◽  
Sebastian Simon Mukka ◽  
Thomas Carlsson ◽  
Gustaf Fredrik Neander ◽  
André Wilhelm Helge Stark ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures

scholarly journals Total Hip Replacement vs. Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yangjun Xu ◽  
Weiping Zheng ◽  
Jinjun Zhou ◽  
Dingjun Jiang ◽  
Xiao Lu
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background: To evaluate the effects of total hip replacement and internal fixation on the outcome of femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in a total of 79 individuals diagnosed with Garden I or Garden II femoral neck fractures aged from 56-71 years old from October 2012 to May 2019. Patients treated with total hip replacement were grouped into group 1, while those treated with internal fixation were grouped into group 2. Baseline characteristics were compared between the two groups to eliminate extra factors. Postoperative activity time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and length of surgical incision were compared between the two groups. Besides, postoperative complications and hip function (Harris score) were detected to evaluate the final effects in the two groups. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups, but the mean duration of surgery was more in group 1 than that in group 2 ( p <0.0001). Blood loss and length of surgical incision were both larger in group 1. However, the incidence of such postoperative complications as lung infection, urinary tract infection and thrombosis of lower limb was lower in group 1 compared with those in group 2. Moreover, the hip function (Harris score) was also better after total hip replacement compared with that after internal fixation. Conclusions: Total hip replacement provides satisfactory clinical outcomes, but with longer operation time and increased blood loss compared with internal fixation.

Total Hip Replacement after Acetabular Fracture : A Review Article

2017 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 2059-2062
Author(s):  
Osama M. Elsayed ◽  
Ahmed M. Mohassab ◽  
Magdy G. Mazeed
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Acetabular Fracture ◽  
Review Article ◽  
Total Hip
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document