The outcome of the uncemented acetabular component in delayed total hip arthroplasty following acetabular fractures

Aims After failed acetabular fractures, total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a challenging procedure and considered the gold standard treatment. The complexity of the procedure depends on the fracture pattern and the initial fracture management. This study’s primary aim was to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for patients who underwent delayed uncemented acetabular THA after acetabular fractures. The secondary aims were to assess the radiological outcome and the incidence of the associated complications in those patients. Methods A total of 40 patients underwent cementless acetabular THA following failed treatment of acetabular fractures. The postoperative clinical and radiological outcomes were evaluated for all the cohort. Results The median (interquartile range (IQR)) Oxford Hip Score (OHS) improved significantly from 9.5 (7 to 11.5), (95% confidence interval (CI) (8 to 10.6)) to 40 (39 to 44), (95% CI (40 to 43)) postoperatively at the latest follow-up (p < 0.001). It was worth noting that the initial acetabular fracture type (simple vs complex), previous acetabular treatment (ORIF vs conservative), fracture union, and restoration of anatomical centre of rotation (COR) did not affect the final OHS. The reconstructed centre of rotation (COR) was restored in 29 (72.5%) patients. The mean abduction angle in whom acetabular fractures were managed conservatively was statistically significantly higher than the surgically treated patients 42.6° (SD 7.4) vs 38° (SD 5.6)) (p = 0.032). We did not have any case of acetabular or femoral loosening at the time of the last follow-up. We had two patients with successful two-stage revision for infection with overall eight-year survival rate was 95.2% (95% CI 86.6% to 100%) with revision for any reason at a median (IQR) duration of follow-up 50 months (16 to 87) months following THA. Conclusion Delayed cementless acetabular THA in patients with previous failed acetabular fracture treatments produces good clinical outcomes (PROMS) with excellent survivorship, despite the technically demanding nature of the procedure. The initial fracture treatment does not influence the outcome of delayed THA. In selected cases of acetabular fractures (either nondisplaced or with secondary congruency), the initial nonoperative treatment neither resulted in large acetabular defects nor required additional acetabular reconstruction at the time of THA. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(12):1067–1074.

Non-traumatic bilateral comminated acetabular fracture

High-energy trauma has been confirmed as a cause of bilateral acetabular fracture. However, there are few reports on nontraumatic bilateral acetabular fracture. We report a case of bilateral acetabular fracture that occurred acutely with no preceding trauma in a 50-year-old man with osteoporosis. The case shows the significance of regular annual calcium and vitamin D screening of patients at a high risk of pathological fracture.

Neglected acetabular fracture with hip dislocation in a 34-year-old subject treated with total hip arthroplasty: our experience

Neglected hip fracture-dislocations are rare but still possible clinical situations, especially in developing countries. Some authors described skeletal traction and open reduction with internal fixation as a treatment for the abovementioned conditions. Despite the poor literature about this topic, total hip arthroplasty (THA) may be a feasible option in the treatment of neglected hip fracture-dislocations. We present a case of a 34-year-old Moroccan man reporting a 1-year neglected acetabular fracture with hip dislocation successfully treated with THA. The patient showed a significant improvement of pain, range of motion and his quality of life at 45 days. Our experience shows how a neglected acetabular fracture with hip dislocation can be successfully treated with THA. Considering the complexity of these cases, an accurate preoperative planning is mandatory and the prosthetic components’ choice must be customised to the patient.