scholarly journals A prospective randomized study of colonoscopy using blue laser imaging and white light imaging in detection and differentiation of colonic polyps

2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (10) ◽  
pp. E1207-E1213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiing Leong Ang ◽  
James Weiquan Li ◽  
Yu Jen Wong ◽  
Yi-Lyn Jessica Tan ◽  
Kwong Ming Fock ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims Published data on blue laser imaging (BLI) for detection and differentiation of colonic polyps are limited compared to narrow band imaging (NBI). This study investigated whether BLI can increase the detection rate of colonic polyps and adenomas when compared to white light imaging (WLI), and examined use of NICE (NBI International Colorectal Endoscopic) and JNET (Japan NBI Expert Team) classifications with BLI. Patients and methods Patients aged 50 years and above referred for colonoscopy were randomized to BLI or WLI on withdrawal. Detected polyps were characterized using NICE and JNET classifications under BLI mode and correlated with histology. Primary outcome was adenoma detection rate. Secondary outcomes were utility of NICE and JNET classifications to predict histology using BLI. Results A total of 182 patients were randomized to BLI (92) or WLI (90). Comparing BLI with WLI, the polyp detection rate was 59.8 % vs 40.0 %, P = 0.008, and the adenoma detection rate was 46.2 % vs 27.8 %, P = 0.010. NICE 1 and JNET 1 diagnosed hyperplastic polyps with sensitivity of 87.18 % and specificity of 84.35 %. NICE 2 diagnosed low- (LGD) or high-grade dysplasia (HGD) with sensitivity of 92.31 % and specificity of 77.45 %. JNET 2A diagnosed LGD with sensitivity of 91.95 %, and specificity of 74.53 %. Four cases of focal HGD all had JNET 2A morphology. Conclusion BLI increased adenoma detection rate compared to WLI. NICE and JNET classifications can be applied when using BLI for endoscopic diagnosis of HP and LGD but histological confirmation remains crucial.

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Tomie ◽  
Osamu Dohi ◽  
Nobuaki Yagi ◽  
Hiroaki Kitae ◽  
Atsushi Majima ◽  
...  

Background/Aims. The aim of this study was to evaluate the endoscopic recognition of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) using four different methods (Olympus white light imaging (O-WLI), Fujifilm white light imaging (F-WLI), narrow band imaging (NBI), and blue laser imaging- (BLI-) bright).Methods.We retrospectively analyzed 25 superficial ESCCs that had been examined using the four different methods. Subjective evaluation was provided by three endoscopists as a ranking score (RS) of each image based on the ease of detection of the cancerous area. For the objective evaluation we calculated the color difference scores (CDS) between the cancerous and noncancerous areas with each of the four methods.Results. There was no difference between the mean RS of O-WLI and F-WLI. The mean RS of NBI was significantly higher than that of O-WLI and that of BLI-bright was significantly higher than that of F-WLI. Moreover, the mean RS of BLI-bright was significantly higher than that of NBI. Furthermore, in the objective evaluation, the mean CDS of BLI-bright was significantly higher than that of O-WLI, F-WLI, and NBI.Conclusion. The recognition of superficial ESCC using BLI-bright was more efficacious than the other methods tested both subjectively and objectively.


Endoscopy ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (02) ◽  
pp. 186-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryo Shimoda ◽  
Yasuhisa Sakata ◽  
Takehiro Fujise ◽  
Kohei Yamanouchi ◽  
Nanae Tsuruoka ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. AB385-AB386
Author(s):  
Dongil Park ◽  
Young-Ho Kim ◽  
Suck-Ho Lee ◽  
Chang Kyun Lee ◽  
Chang Soo Eun ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osamu Dohi ◽  
Nobuaki Yagi ◽  
Yuji Naito ◽  
Akifumi Fukui ◽  
Yasuyuki Gen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document