Chapter 3 Safe Epinephrine in the Finger Means No Tourniquet

2022 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
No Tourniquet

WALANT Technique versus Sedation for Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release

Hand ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 155894472110031
Author(s):  
Ian Wellington ◽  
Antonio Cusano ◽  
Joel V. Ferreira ◽  
Anthony Parrino
Keyword(s):  
Local Anesthesia ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Postanesthesia Care Unit ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Average Operating ◽  
Wide Awake ◽  
No Tourniquet ◽  
Room Time

Background This study sought to investigate complication rates/perioperative metrics after endoscopic carpal tunnel release (eCTR) via wide-awake, local anesthesia, no tourniquet (WALANT) versus sedation or local anesthesia with a tourniquet. Methods Patients aged 18 years or older who underwent an eCTR between April 28, 2018, and December 31, 2019, by 1 of 2 fellowship-trained surgeons at our single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 3 groups: monitored anesthesia care with tourniquet (MT), local anesthesia with tourniquet (LT), and WALANT. Results Inclusion criteria were met by 156 cases; 53 (34%) were performed under MT, 25 (16%) under LT, and 78 (50%) under WALANT. The MT group (46.1 ± 9.7) was statistically younger compared with LT (56.3 ± 14.1, P = .007) and WALANT groups (53.5 ± 15.8, P = .008), F(2, 153) = 6.465, P = .002. Wide-awake, local anesthesia, no tourniquet had decreased procedural times (10 minutes, SD: 2) compared with MT (11 minutes, SD: 2) and LT (11 minutes, SD: 2), F(2, 153) = 5.732, P = .004). Trends favored WALANT over MT and LT for average operating room time (20 minutes, SD: 3 vs 32 minutes, SD: 6 vs 23 minutes, SD: 3, respectively, F(2, 153) = 101.1, P < .001), postanesthesia care unit time (12 minutes, SD: 7 vs 1:12 minutes, SD: 26 vs 20 minutes, SD: 22, respectively, F(2, 153) =171.1, P < .001), and door-to-door time (1:37 minutes, SD: 21 vs 2:51 minutes, SD: 40 vs 1:46 minutes, SD: 33, respectively, F(2, 153) = 109.3, P < .001). There were no differences in complication rates. Conclusions Our data suggest favorable trends for patients undergoing eCTR via WALANT versus MT versus LT.

scholarly journals 600 The Use of a Wide-Awake Local Anaesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) Technique in Foot and Ankle Procedures - A Randomised Control Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
T M Borg ◽  
M Tahir ◽  
N Heidari
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Local Anaesthesia ◽  
Randomised Control Trial ◽  
P Value ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Post Procedure ◽  
Trimalleolar Fractures ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Wide Awake ◽  
No Tourniquet

Abstract Introduction Wide awake local anaesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) is a widely used technique in upper limb procedures that has gained increasing popularity during the coronavirus pandemic. The benefit of WALANT for foot and ankle surgeries is less clear, especially in patients with multiple comorbities. The primary aim of this study was to compare post-operative pain levels in patients undergoing ankle fracture fixation. Secondary objectives included comparison of intra-operative patient experiences, clinical outcomes, and patient satisfaction 1-year post-procedure. Method 129 patients presenting with ankle fractures were enrolled in a multicenter randomised control trial from February 2016 to January 2020. Patients with medial malleolar, lateral malleolar, bimalleolar or trimalleolar fractures received either WALANT (62 patients) or spinal anaesthesia (67 patients). A 5ml solution of 0.9% saline and 2% lidocaine with 1: 100,000 adrenaline was used for WALANT. Results Compared to patients who received spinal anaesthesia, those in the WALANT group experienced less post-operative discomfort and were more satisfied 1-year post-procedure (p-value = 0.003). Surgical outcomes were similar for both groups. Cost analysis revealed that WALANT is significantly more economical. Conclusions WALANT is an effective and safe anaesthetic for foot and ankle procedures. Without use of a tourniquet, it reduces post-operative pain and so, eases patient recovery.

scholarly journals Transverse versus longitudinal incision for minimally invasive Achilles tendon repair

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0016
Author(s):  
Daniel Bohl ◽  
Eric Barnard ◽  
Kamran Movassaghi ◽  
Kamran Hamid ◽  
Adam Schiff
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Suture Material ◽  
Tendon Repair ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Transverse Incision ◽  
Longitudinal Incision ◽  
Achilles Tendon Repair ◽  
Deep Suture ◽  
No Tourniquet

Category: Sports Introduction/Purpose: The rate of wound complications following traditional open Achilles tendon repair is reported at 7-8%. In an effort to reduce the rate of wound complications, orthopaedic surgeons have adopted novel minimally invasive techniques. The purpose of this study is to characterize the rate of wound and other early complications following a minimally invasive Achilles tendon repair, to identify any factors associated with increased risk. Methods: The postoperative courses of 55 patients who underwent minimally invasive Achilles tendon repair by two surgeons at separate academic medical centers were retrospectively reviewed. Repair technique was similar in all cases, making use of the same commercially available suture-guidance jig, silicone-impregnated deep suture material, and locking stitch technique. However, 31 procedures used a longitudinal incision and a tourniquet (one surgeon’s preference), while 24 procedures used a transverse incision and no tourniquet (the second surgeon’s preference). Of the 24 procedures using transverse incisions, 2 had to be converted to L-shaped incisions to achieve better access to the tendon. The rates of early complications within 3 months after surgery were characterized and compared between patients with differing procedural characteristics. Results: Of the 55 patients included in the study, 2 (3.6%) developed wound complications. Both wound complications appeared to be reactions to the deep suture material (see Table 1 for details). There was no statistical difference in the rate of wound complications between patients in the longitudinal incision/tourniquet group and patients in the transverse incision/no tourniquet group (6.5% versus 0.0%; p=0.499). Three patients (5.5%) developed sural neuropraxia, which manifested as mild-to-moderate subjective numbness with sensation remaining intact to light touch. There were no cases of re-rupture. At 3-month follow-up, all 55 patients had intact Thompson tests and well-healed wounds. Conclusion: The rate of wound complications following minimally invasive Achilles repair is low at 3.6%. The present study could not demonstrate a difference in risk for wound complications between patients treated with a longitudinal incision and tourniquet and patients treated with a transverse incision and no tourniquet. The wound complications we observed were primarily attributable to inflammatory reactions to the silicone-impregnated deep suture material. Patients should be counseled that although risk for wound complications may be lower with minimally invasive techniques, such techniques do risk sural neuropraxia and deep suture reaction. Further prospective analysis is warranted.

Modeled Wide-Awake, Local-Anesthetic, No-Tourniquet Surgical Procedures Do Not Impair Driving Fitness

2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (18) ◽  
pp. 1616-1622
Author(s):  
Noah J. Thompson Orfield ◽  
Ariel E. Badger ◽  
Allison N. Tegge ◽  
Maryam Davoodi ◽  
Miguel A. Perez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Local Anesthetic ◽  
Driving Fitness ◽  
Wide Awake ◽  
No Tourniquet

Wide Awake Hand Surgery Under Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet in South America

Hand Clinics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro José Pires Neto ◽  
Samuel Ribak ◽  
Trajano Sardenberg
Keyword(s):  
South America ◽  
Local Anesthesia ◽  
Hand Surgery ◽  
Wide Awake ◽  
No Tourniquet

scholarly journals Positive patient experience of wide awake local anaesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) hand surgery in the government setting: a prospective descriptive study

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaco J Naude ◽  
Odette Koch ◽  
Ludwig W Schmidt ◽  
Theo LB le Roux
Keyword(s):  
Patient Experience ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Local Anaesthesia ◽  
Surgical Procedure ◽  
Hand Surgery ◽  
Descriptive Study ◽  
Trigger Finger ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Wide Awake ◽  
No Tourniquet

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to establish a subjective patient experience with wide awake local anaesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) procedures performed in the institution from May 2019 to March 2020. WALANT surgery was initiated to improve standard operating procedure and to decrease theatre burden METHODS: This prospective, descriptive study included 100 patients with a mean age of 59 years who required either a carpal tunnel or trigger finger release. The patients' pain experience was documented on the visual analogue scale (VAS) for the local anaesthetic injection and the surgical procedure. Overall experience was assessed on the patient's preference to have the procedure performed by the WALANT method or the conventional method RESULTS: One hundred patients were included, of which 67 had medical comorbidities. The mean VAS score was 1.5 (SD±1.6) with pain on injection. The mean VAS pain score during the surgical procedure was 0.2 (SD±0.7). One hundred per cent of patients (100/100) felt they would do the WALANT outpatient procedure again instead of admission to hospital and surgery in the theatre. Two complications occurred related to wound care problems, and were successfully managed. None of the patients required reoperations for incomplete release of the carpal tunnel or trigger finger surgery CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that minor hand surgery using the WALANT protocol can be performed effectively and with high patient satisfaction rates in the orthopaedic outpatient clinic, and is a useful tool in the skillset of a hand surgeon Level of evidence: Level 4 Keywords: WALANT, hand surgery, trigger finger, carpal tunnel release

Wide-Awake Anesthesia for Olecranon Fracture Fixation

Hand ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 155894471986170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir Adham Ahmad ◽  
Shahril Shuhairi Sabari ◽  
Shairil Rahayu Ruslan ◽  
Shalimar Abdullah ◽  
Abdul Rauf Ahmad
Keyword(s):  
Posterior Approach ◽  
Olecranon Fracture ◽  
Locking Plates ◽  
Pain Rating ◽  
Rating Score ◽  
Tumescent Anesthesia ◽  
Ulna Fractures ◽  
Surgical Fixation ◽  
Wide Awake ◽  
No Tourniquet

Introduction: Wide-awake local anesthesia and no tourniquet (WALANT) has come a long way. It has been reported to be successful in the surgery of distal radius and ulna fractures. We report a case of olecranon fracture plating under WALANT. Methods: Surgery was performed with the patient fully conscious where tumescent anesthesia was injected into the surgical site without application of tourniquet 30 minutes before the first incision. Posterior approach to the elbow was used, and the fracture was fixed with anatomical locking plates. Results: The surgery was successfully completed without pain. The numerical pain rating score was 0 throughout the surgery. Conclusions: The use of WALANT for surgical fixation can be expanded beyond the hand and wrist. This is a safe and simple option for patients at high risk of general anesthesia, producing similar surgical outcomes without intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document