scholarly journals Arthroscopic Primary Repair of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harmen D. Vermeijden ◽  
Jelle P. van der List ◽  
Gregory S. DiFelice
Keyword(s):  
Posterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Primary Repair ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Knee Injuries ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Early Mobilization ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Tibial Translation

AbstractThe posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is one of the four major stabilizers of the knee joint and functions as the primary restraint to posterior tibial translation. PCL tears rarely occur in isolation and most commonly presents in the setting of multiligamentous knee injuries. Several treatment strategies for these injuries have been proposed over the last decades, including ligament reconstruction and primary repair. Arthroscopic primary PCL repair has the potential to preserve native tissue using a more minimally invasive approach, thereby avoiding donor-site morbidity and allowing early mobilization. While arthroscopic PCL repair is certainly not an effective surgical approach for all patients, this procedure may be a reasonable and less morbid alternative to PCL reconstruction in selected patients treated for proximal or distal avulsion tears, with low failure rates, good knee stability, and good to excellent subjective outcomes. The surgical indications, surgical techniques, postoperative management, and outcomes for arthroscopic primary repair of proximal and distal PCL tears will be discussed in this review.

Reconstructions of the Knee Following Combined Injury to the Posterior Cruciate Ligament and the Posterior Lateral Structures

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Askew ◽  
William B. Wiley ◽  
Arne Melby ◽  
Donald A. Noe
Keyword(s):  
Posterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Injuries ◽  
Cartilage Degeneration ◽  
Surgical Reconstruction ◽  
Combined Injury ◽  
Rotary Instability ◽  
Lateral Structures ◽  
Tibial Translation ◽  
Combined Injuries

The posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) provides primary restraint to posterior tibial translation (1). Knee injuries involving only the PCL usually result in minimal disability, and are commonly treated non-surgically (2). However, combined injuries of the PCL and the posterior lateral structures (PLS) in the knee can result in considerable abnormal posterior laxity and posterolateral rotary instability leading to rapid cartilage degeneration (3). There is consensus that, in most cases, knees with this combined injury require surgical reconstruction.

Primary Repair for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

1996 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 298-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus Richter ◽  
Hartmuth Kiefer ◽  
Gerhard Hehl ◽  
Lothar Kinzl
Keyword(s):  
Posterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Primary Repair ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Ligament Injuries

scholarly journals Single-Stage Arthroscopic Anterior and Posterior Cruciate Ligament Repairs and Open Medial Collateral Ligament Repair for Acute Knee Dislocation

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Ryo Murakami ◽  
Eisaburo Honda ◽  
Atsushi Fukai ◽  
Hiroki Yoshitomi ◽  
Takaki Sanada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Posterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Medial Collateral Ligament ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Injuries ◽  
Knee Dislocation ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Lateral Condyle ◽  
Ligament Repair ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Medial Condyle

Till date, there are no clear guidelines regarding the treatment of multiple ligament knee injuries. Ligament repair is advantageous as it preserves proprioception and does not involve grafting. Many studies have reported the use of open repair and reconstruction for multiple ligament knee injuries; however, reports on arthroscopic-combined single-stage anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) repairs are scarce. In this report, we describe a case of type III knee dislocation (ACL, PCL, and medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries) in a 43-year-old man, caused by contact while playing futsal. On the sixth day after injury, arthroscopic ACL and PCL repairs were performed with open MCL repair. The proximal lesions in the three ligaments that were injured were sutured using no. 2 strong surgical sutures. The ACL was pulled out to the lateral condyle of the femur and fixed using a suspensory fixation device. The PCL was pulled out to the medial condyle of the femur, and the MCL was pulled towards the proximal end of the femur; both were fixed using suture anchors. Early mobilization was performed, and both, clinical and imaging outcomes, were good two years after surgery.

Posteromedial Ligament Repair of the Knee With Suture Tape Augmentation: A Biomechanical Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (12) ◽  
pp. 2952-2959 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian T. Mehl ◽  
Cameron Kia ◽  
Matthew Murphy ◽  
Elifho Obopilwe ◽  
Mark Cote ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Rotation ◽  
Knee Flexion ◽  
Primary Repair ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Ligament Repair ◽  
Acl Injuries ◽  
Tendon Reconstruction ◽  
Reasonable Alternative ◽  
Suture Tape

Background: In cases of acute combined posteromedial and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, primary repair of the superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) and posterior oblique ligament (POL) with suture tape augmentation may be a reasonable alternative to standard tendon reconstruction techniques. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to examine the rotational and valgus laxity with ACL strain following sMCL and POL repair with suture tape augmentation at various degrees of knee flexion. It was hypothesized that this technique would restore knee laxity and kinematics comparable with those of the intact state. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten cadaveric knee specimens (mean ± SD, 57.9 ± 5.9 years) were obtained. Specimens were tested with the tibia fixed and the femur mobile on an X-Y table. Each specimen was tested in 4 conditions according to the state of the sMCL and POL: native, deficient, repaired with suture tape augmentation, and reconstructed with tendon allografts. Valgus laxity was tested with 40-N force applied in the lateral direction of the femur, and rotational motion was tested with 5-N torque applied to the tibia. ACL strain during valgus stress was also measured. Each condition was tested in 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, and 60° of knee flexion. Results: Dissection of the sMCL and POL led to significantly increased valgus laxity in all flexion angles, with a significant increase in ACL strain at 30° ( P < .001) and 45° ( P < .001). Ligament repair with suture tape augmentation demonstrated similar valgus and rotational laxity as compared with intact specimens, with the exception of increased internal rotation at 30° ( P = .005). Ligament reconstruction resulted in significantly increased valgus opening at 45° ( P = .048) and significantly increased internal rotation at 30° ( P < .001) as compared with the native state. Direct comparison between surgical techniques showed no significant differences. Conclusion: At time zero, ligament repair of the posteromedial knee with suture tape augmentation restored close-to-native valgus and rotatory laxity, as well as native ACL strain for cases of complete sMCL and POL avulsion. Clinical Relevance: Ligament repair of the sMCL and POL with suture tape augmentation may be a reasonable alternative to tendon reconstruction techniques in cases of acute combined posteromedial and ACL injuries with valgus and rotatory instability.

Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the Multiple Ligament Injured Knee

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (05) ◽  
pp. 421-430
Author(s):  
Michelle E. Kew ◽  
Mark D. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Posterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Injury ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Injuries ◽  
Surgical Reconstruction ◽  
Nonsurgical Management ◽  
Injured Knee ◽  
Tibial Inlay ◽  
Low Activity

AbstractMultiligamentous knee injuries are challenging to treat and diagnose. Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries are commonly found in the constellation of injuries included in a multiligamentous knee injury and are caused by a posteriorly directed force on the proximal tibia with relation to the femoral condyles. A thorough history and physical examination should be performed to evaluate for associated neurovascular injuries and associated ligamentous, chondral, or bony injuries. Nonsurgical management is reserved for patients who are critically ill or have very low activity demands. Surgical reconstruction is recommended for most patients with multiligamentous knee injuries. The PCL reconstruction can be undertaken with several different graft options and reconstruction techniques, including the transtibial, arthroscopic tibial inlay, and open tibial inlay approach. The literature has a paucity of data regarding outcomes among the various reconstructive options, so the optimal surgical technique has not been established.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document