SIEA Flap for Breast Reconstruction: Refinements in Flap Selection Criteria

2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (04) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aldona Spiegel ◽  
Farah Khan
2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pouria Moradi ◽  
Charlie Durrant ◽  
Graeme E. Glass ◽  
Evitta Askouni ◽  
Simon Wood ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Gerald Duff ◽  
Colin Morrison

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (08) ◽  
pp. 622-630
Author(s):  
Han Gyu Cha ◽  
Min Kyu Kang ◽  
Hyun Ho Han ◽  
Eun Key Kim ◽  
Jin Sup Eom

Abstract Background The low deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap was first introduced in 2016 as it had aesthetic advantages over the conventional DIEP flap. With our experience of over 100 low DIEP flap procedures to date, we have conspicuously lowered complication rates and established more definitive criteria to select proper candidates. Methods We analyzed 103 patients who underwent breast reconstruction with the low DIEP flap at our hospital between May 2014 and June 2018. Demographics, patient selection criteria, flap specifics, surgical outcomes including postoperative complications, and the location of the abdominal scar and umbilicus were reviewed retrospectively. Results The mean patient age was 46.7 years, and the average body mass index was 23.7 kg/m2. A low DIEP with an average weight of 377 g was utilized within 6 hours 17 minutes in this cohort. There was no significant difference in the rate of venous congestion or fat necrosis compared with the conventional DIEP flap. The average distance from the pubic hairline to the abdominal scar was 0.6 cm and from the anterior superior iliac spine to the abdominal scar was −0.4 cm. The postoperative location of the umbilicus was 7.0 cm above the pubic hairline. Conclusion The low DIEP flap is not only a reliable option for a breast reconstruction but is an aesthetically superior approach with a lower abdominal scar and natural umbilicus. Patients may benefit from this technique if prudently selected by computed tomography (CT) angiography. A perforator that is larger than 1 mm in diameter and well enhanced on CT angiography from the division of the external iliac artery to the abdominal skin particularly in the intramuscular course should be selected.


2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (07) ◽  
pp. 474-482
Author(s):  
Alberto Okada ◽  
Diego Pereira ◽  
Eduardo Montag ◽  
Marcelo Portocarrero ◽  
Carlos Felício ◽  
...  

Background Free flap breast reconstruction is a conventional procedure in many countries; however, microvascular compromise remains a devastating outcome. Given the morbidity of total necrosis, optimizing free flap salvage stands out as an important area for research, especially among surgeons to overcome the learning curve period and in resource constrained scenario such as community hospitals. To ensure free deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP)/superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap breast reconstruction, the authors present a technique involving raising a hemiabdominal flap as a free flap, and banking the remaining flap to be utilized if needed in a subsequent procedure. Methods A retrospective review was performed on all free flap breast reconstructions. In this period, 84 patients (mean age: 50.1 ± 8 years) were included. Results In this study, 65.5% patients underwent immediate reconstruction, and 51.2% received DIEP reconstruction; 9.52% patients were returned to the operating room, and salvage reconstruction using the banked flap was performed in all patients. No differences were observed regarding early complications and age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, diabetes, smoking history, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and type of flap used (p > 0.05). Hypertension was significantly associated with early complications (p < 0.05). Donor-site complications were associated with RT (p < 0.05). Conclusion The banked flap is a reliable method for ensuring DIEP/SIEA flap survival and should be considered in higher risk reconstructions and community hospitals. We believe that the present technique can be a good addition to the arsenal of plastic surgeons dealing with free flap breast reconstructions in selected patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 473-482
Author(s):  
Ya-han Yu ◽  
Dina Ghorra ◽  
Christine Bojanic ◽  
Oti N. Aria ◽  
Louise MacLennan ◽  
...  

Superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flaps represent a useful option in autologous breast reconstruction. However, the short-fixed pedicle can limit flap inset options. We present a challenging flap inset successfully addressed by de-epithelialization, turnover, and counterintuitive rotation. A 47-year-old woman underwent left tertiary breast reconstruction with stacked free flaps using right deep inferior epigastric perforator and left SIEA vessels. Antegrade and retrograde anastomoses to the internal mammary (IM) vessels were preferred; additionally, the thoracodorsal vessels were unavailable due to previous latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction. Optimal shaping required repositioning of the lateral ends of the flaps superiorly, which would position the ipsilateral SIEA hemi-flap pedicle lateral to and out of reach of the IM vessels. This problem was overcome by turning the SIEA flap on its long axis, allowing the pedicle to sit medially with the lateral end of the flap positioned superiorly. The de-epithelialized SIEA flap dermis was in direct contact with the chest wall, enabling its fixation. This method of flap inset provides a valuable solution for medializing the SIEA pedicle while maintaining an aesthetically satisfactory orientation. This technique could be used in ipsilateral SIEA flap breast reconstructions that do not require a skin paddle, as with stacked flaps or following nipple-sparing mastectomy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 16-20
Author(s):  
Łukasz Ulatowski ◽  
Bartłomiej Noszczyk

Leczenie raka piersi stanowi ważne zagadnienie dla onkologów i chirurgów plastycznych. Dokonuje się znaczący postęp dotyczący wiedzy i sposobów terapii tego nowotworu. Leczenie niejednokrotnie wymaga rekonstrukcji amputowanej piersi. Współczesne metody są coraz doskonalsze i coraz bardziej dopasowane do potrzeb pacjentki. Jednocześnie obserwowany jest stały wzrost zainteresowania oceną jakości życia po wykonywanych procedurach medycznych. Taki trend obserwowany jest szczególnie w chirurgii plastycznej, gdzie prosta ocena ilości powikłań nie jest wystarczająca. Aby skutecznie pomagać, istnieje potrzeba skrupulatnej oceny leczenia dokonanej przez pacjentki. Celem pracy jest omówienie i przedstawienie zastosowania kwestionariusza BREAST-Q. Pozwala on na ocenę zadowolenia chorej ze zrekonstruowanej piersi, satysfakcji z całego procesu leczenia rekonstrukcyjnego i opieki medycznej. W pracy przedstawiono wyniki badania jakości życia kwestionariuszem BREAST-Q u 20 pacjentek po wtórnej rekonstrukcji piersi płatem DIEP bez usuwania żebra podczas uzyskiwania dostępu do naczyń dawczych. Ocena jakości życia pacjentek służy chirurgowi zajmującemu się rekonstrukcją do analizy swojej pracy. Pozwala na głębsze zrozumienie potrzeb i lepsze doradzanie kolejnym pacjentkom podczas konsultacji przedoperacyjnych. Uzyskane wyniki mogą być też przydatne dla płatnika przy podejmowaniu decyzji odnośnie do poziomu refundacji poszczególnych procedur.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document