Changes in Quality of Care after Hospital Mergers and Acquisitions

2020 ◽  
Vol 382 (19) ◽  
pp. 1867-1868
2020 ◽  
Vol 382 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy D. Beaulieu ◽  
Leemore S. Dafny ◽  
Bruce E. Landon ◽  
Jesse B. Dalton ◽  
Ifedayo Kuye ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (1) ◽  
pp. 12177
Author(s):  
Daan Westra ◽  
Federica Angeli ◽  
Ron Kemp ◽  
Maarten Batterink ◽  
Jan Reitsma

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 489-503
Author(s):  
David de Kam ◽  
Marianne van Bochove ◽  
Roland Bal

PurposeDespite the continuation of hospital mergers in many western countries, it is uncertain if and how hospital mergers impact the quality of care. This poses challenges for the regulation of mergers. The purpose of this paper is to understand: how regulators and hospitals frame the impact of merging on the quality and safety of care and how hospital mergers might be regulated, given their uncertain impact on quality and safety of care.Design/methodology/approachThis paper studies the regulation of hospital mergers in The Netherlands. In a qualitative study design, it draws on 30 semi-structured interviews with inspectors from the Dutch Health and Youth Care Inspectorate (Inspectorate) and respondents from three hospitals that merged between 2013 and 2015. This paper draws from literature on process-based regulation to understand how regulators can monitor hospital mergers.FindingsThis paper finds that inspectors and hospital respondents frame the process of merging as potentially disruptive to daily care practices. While inspectors emphasise the dangers of merging, hospital respondents report how merging stimulated them to reflect on their care practices and how it afforded learning between hospitals. Although the Inspectorate considers mergers a risk to quality of care, their regulatory practices are hesitant.Originality/valueThis qualitative study sheds light on how merging might affect key hospital processes and daily care practices. It offers opportunities for the regulation of hospital mergers that acknowledges rather than aims to dispel the uncertain and potentially ambiguous impact of mergers on quality and safety of care.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. e2124662
Author(s):  
H. Joanna Jiang ◽  
Kathryn R. Fingar ◽  
Lan Liang ◽  
Rachel M. Henke ◽  
Teresa P. Gibson

Author(s):  
Rui Jie Ng ◽  
Nik Nur Eliza Mohamed ◽  
Ili Liyana Khairul Anuar ◽  
Kun Yun Lee ◽  
Nurul Syarbani Eliana Musa ◽  
...  

Cluster Hospital Initiative (CHI) in Malaysia is a hospital merger exercise to establish an integrated network of specialist and non-specialist hospitals. The resource sharing, services realignment, and better care coordination from this integration have been shown to improve operational efficiency and quality of care from the providers’ perspective. However, there are very limited studies which focus on the effects of hospital merger on patients. Therefore, this study aims to explore patients’ and caregivers’ experiences of CHI. A qualitative study using purposive sampling was conducted from July to August 2017 at the three pilot sites. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 85 patients and caregivers who received healthcare services before and after CHI. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using thematic text analysis. Three main themes transpired from the analysis were changes in healthcare service delivery, time spent on healthcare-related activities, and financial implications. Firstly, participants were generally satisfied with the increased access to specialist services, better quality of care, and upgraded equipment and facilities. Secondly, many participants experienced a shorter waiting time and reduced travelling time after CHI. Thirdly, CHI led to financial savings for the participants in terms of reduced out-of-pocket expenditure and productivity loss. This study demonstrated that the implementation of CHI appeared to be well-received by the patients. The expected benefits brought on by hospital mergers were also acknowledged by the study participants. A follow-up study is recommended due to the short duration of CHI implementation and low awareness about the initiative among patients.


ASHA Leader ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 2-2
Author(s):  
Dennis Hampton
Keyword(s):  

2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 229-229
Author(s):  
David C. Miller ◽  
John M. Hollingsworth ◽  
Khaled S. Hafez ◽  
Stephanie Daignault ◽  
Brent K. Hollenbeck

2007 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  
MARY ELLEN SCHNEIDER
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document