scholarly journals Assessment of shock wave lithotripters via cavitation potential

2007 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 086103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan I. Iloreta ◽  
Yufeng Zhou ◽  
Georgy N. Sankin ◽  
Pei Zhong ◽  
Andrew J. Szeri
2010 ◽  
Vol 127 (3) ◽  
pp. 1761-1761
Author(s):  
Nathan Smith ◽  
W. Neal Simmons ◽  
Georgy Sankin ◽  
Pei Zhong

2013 ◽  
Vol 190 (3) ◽  
pp. 1096-1101 ◽  
Author(s):  
John G. Mancini ◽  
Andreas Neisius ◽  
Nathan Smith ◽  
Georgy Sankin ◽  
Gaston M. Astroza ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 735-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Lázaro ◽  
Kathryn Fitch

AbstractWe studied the role of economic incentives for private providers in explaining Spain's disproportionately large number of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripters (ESWLs) and low number of linear accelerators (linacs) per million population (pmp) in comparison to other countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). We found that the reimbursement policy for 1990 allowed an average profit per private ESWL of $732,000, but no profit for linacs. Regional per-capita income was positively correlated with ESWLs pmp in Spain (R2 = 0.49; p =.001), but not with linacs. Sixty-nine percent of ESWLs were privately held versus only 16% of linacs. To avoid these types of distortions, financial incentives should be based on a reasonable relationship between cost and charges and should be associated with the appropriateness of medical care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document