scholarly journals Loss analysis of back-contact back-junction thin-film monocrystalline silicon solar cells

2011 ◽  
Vol 110 (12) ◽  
pp. 124510 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Haase ◽  
S. Eidelloth ◽  
R. Horbelt ◽  
K. Bothe ◽  
E. Garralaga Rojas ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 511-512 ◽  
pp. 411-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.J. Kim ◽  
V. Depauw ◽  
G. Agostinelli ◽  
G. Beaucarne ◽  
J. Poortmans

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (S4) ◽  
pp. A465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xianqin Meng ◽  
Valérie Depauw ◽  
Guillaume Gomard ◽  
Ounsi El Daif ◽  
Christos Trompoukis ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 1101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Soderstrom ◽  
Franz-Joseph Haug ◽  
Xavier Niquille ◽  
Oscar Cubero ◽  
Stéphanie Perregaux ◽  
...  

AbstractIn the nip or substrate configuration thin film silicon solar cells, the choice of front TCO contact is critical because there is a trade off between its transparency which influences the current in the solar cell and its conductivity which influences the series resistance. Here, we investigate the optical behavior of two different TCO front contacts, either a 70 nm thick, nominally flat ITO or a 2 μm thick rough LPCVD ZnO. The back contact consists of LP-CVD ZnO with random texture. First we investigate the influence of the rough and flat front TCOs in μc-Si:H and a-Si:H solar cells. With the back contact geometries used in this work, the antireflection properties of ITO are effective at providing as much light trapping as the rough LP-CVD ZnO. In the second part, we demonstrate that total of 25 to 26 mA/cm2is achievable in nip micromorph tandem cells and show short circuit current up to 11.7 mA/cm2 using an SIO based intermediate reflector.


2012 ◽  
Vol 106 ◽  
pp. 37-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre J. Verlinden ◽  
Monica Aleman ◽  
Niels Posthuma ◽  
Jara Fernandez ◽  
Bartek Pawlak ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document