Postoperative Lavage and On Demand Surgical Intervention in the Treatment of Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis

2000 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. De Waele ◽  
U. J. Hesse ◽  
P. Pattyn ◽  
J. Decruyenaere ◽  
B. de Hemptinne
2009 ◽  
Vol 43 (9) ◽  
pp. 1486-1495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marisel Segarra-Newnham ◽  
Augustus Hough

Objective: To review studies of antibiotic prophylaxis in acute necrotizing pancreatitis published in the last decade and update recommendations. Data Sources: A search of PubMed (1998–July 2009) was conducted using the terms necrotizing pancreatitis, antibiotics, prophylaxis, and treatment. Clinical studies, meta-analyses, and review articles published in English were included. Additional references were obtained from article bibliographies. Randomized trials published before 1998 were included if indicated. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Relevant studies or meta-analyses on antibiotic prophylaxis since our previous review in 1998 were evaluated; older data were included if still relevant. Data Synthesis: Since our previous review, 4 more randomized trials, including 2 double-blind trials, have been conducted. The blinded studies found no significant difference in mortality with antibiotic prophylaxis compared with placebo, while the unblinded studies found a significant decrease in infections. Given these disparate results, available guidelines and meta-analyses provide different conclusions, usually based on exclusion or inclusion of a single trial. Based on all available data, antibiotic prophylaxis should not be used in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. Instead, a more measured, on-demand use of antibiotics is preferred. Antibiotics should be added if signs and symptoms of infection are present (eg, fever, leukocytosis, positive results of cultures). Given improvements in intensive care and nutritional support, recent trials have found a lower incidence of infected necrotizing pancreatitis than before. Therefore, future trials are likely to need higher numbers of patients. Conclusions: Use of antibiotic prophylaxis for patients with necrotizing pancreatitis is not indicated, based on 2 blinded trials. Instead, on-demand use of antibiotics appears to be appropriate. Given progress in intensive care and the high crossover rate in studies, the need for antibiotic prophylaxis may continue to be debated for decades.


1974 ◽  
Vol 127 (4) ◽  
pp. 484-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew L. Warshaw ◽  
Anthony L. Imbembo ◽  
Joseph M. Civetta ◽  
Willard M. Daggett

2003 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-103
Author(s):  
Dejan Radenkovic ◽  
Djordje Bajec ◽  
Aleksandar Karamarkovic ◽  
Pavle Gregoric ◽  
Miroslav Milicevic

The rationale of surgical intervention during acute necrotizing pancreatitis is to remove necrotic tissue preserving healthy glandular parenchyma and other adjacent structures, thus limiting severe complications. Necrosectomy and debridment are crucial in surgical management, further treatment of pancreatic bad and peripancreatic tissue are still matter of debate among pancreatic surgeons. Zipper technique is one of the three recognized methods for the surgical management of necrotizing pancreatitis. The aim this study was to review the literature date about treatment using this technique, as well to compare the results of treatment with other techniques, in order to present the advantage and shortage of zipper technique.


Author(s):  
A. Fritsch ◽  
J. Funovics ◽  
N. Hölbling ◽  
P. Sporn ◽  
W. Mauritz ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 46 (05) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Biczó ◽  
P Hegyi ◽  
S Dósa ◽  
B Iványi ◽  
K Jármay ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document