The spatial scale of European colonization and land alienation in Northern New South Wales, 1850–1910

1983 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 322-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Jamieson ◽  
D. N. Jeans ◽  
J. J. H. Forster
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathy Smith

This article explores nomadic site occupation as a form of planetary colonization involving both human and non-human agents. Conventional understandings of temporary occupation are often humancentric with little attention paid to the disruption of extant site ecologies and processes. The latter are particularly pressing concerns in nomadic settlements located in precarious landscapes. Taking the latter as its focus, this article engages the earth as an agent resisting its own colonization in the Australian-licensed squatter settlement known colloquially as Tin City. Located within the largest mobile sand dune structure in New South Wales, Tin City is an assemblage of several self-built fishing shacks accommodating a nomadic population. Its occupants engage in a daily battle against the shifting sands that threaten to subsume their temporary homes. Located in an area of significant indigenous heritage, the Tin City settlement has become a tourist attraction shrouded in local lore. Current discourses about it and its architectures generally focus on its unusual aesthetics, its contested sociopolitical histories and its ecology, with some discussion on the impacts of European colonization on the sand dune’s dynamic geomorphology. To concentrate on the latter, the article develops and deploys the posthumanist conceptualization of the earth posited by Iranian philosopher Reza Negarestani in his ficto-critical text Cyclonopedia: Complicity with Anonymous Materials. Negarestani ascribes the earth with sentient and agentic capacity, whilst the nomads who traverse its surfaces become the penultimate planetary colonizers. Tin City’s occupation thus becomes a story of colonization and resistance narrated by the earth itself, and a reminder that the production and consumption of architectural forms does not need to be confined to that which is conventionally human.


2007 ◽  
Vol 134 (3) ◽  
pp. 310-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pia C. Winberg ◽  
Tim P. Lynch ◽  
Anna Murray ◽  
Alan R. Jones ◽  
Andrew R. Davis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document