Behaviour of krull dimension under extension of the base field

1991 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-156
Author(s):  
Timothy J. Hodges ◽  
Kyunghee Kim ◽  
Richard Resco
Keyword(s):  
2011 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 433-440
Author(s):  
A. HAGHANY ◽  
M. MAZROOEI ◽  
M. R. VEDADI

AbstractGeneralizing the concept of right bounded rings, a module MR is called bounded if annR(M/N)≤eRR for all N≤eMR. The module MR is called fully bounded if (M/P) is bounded as a module over R/annR(M/P) for any ℒ2-prime submodule P◃MR. Boundedness and right boundedness are Morita invariant properties. Rings with all modules (fully) bounded are characterized, and it is proved that a ring R is right Artinian if and only if RR has Krull dimension, all R-modules are fully bounded and ideals of R are finitely generated as right ideals. For certain fully bounded ℒ2-Noetherian modules MR, it is shown that the Krull dimension of MR is at most equal to the classical Krull dimension of R when both dimensions exist.


2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio J. Calderón Martín

AbstractLet {({\mathfrak{H}},\mu,\alpha)} be a regular Hom-algebra of arbitrary dimension and over an arbitrary base field {{\mathbb{F}}}. A basis {{\mathcal{B}}=\{e_{i}\}_{i\in I}} of {{\mathfrak{H}}} is called multiplicative if for any {i,j\in I}, we have that {\mu(e_{i},e_{j})\in{\mathbb{F}}e_{k}} and {\alpha(e_{i})\in{\mathbb{F}}e_{p}} for some {k,p\in I}. We show that if {{\mathfrak{H}}} admits a multiplicative basis, then it decomposes as the direct sum {{\mathfrak{H}}=\bigoplus_{r}{{\mathfrak{I}}}_{r}} of well-described ideals admitting each one a multiplicative basis. Also, the minimality of {{\mathfrak{H}}} is characterized in terms of the multiplicative basis and it is shown that, in case {{\mathcal{B}}}, in addition, it is a basis of division, then the above direct sum is composed by means of the family of its minimal ideals, each one admitting a multiplicative basis of division.


1993 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 705-710
Author(s):  
Robert L. Snider
Keyword(s):  

1992 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 2863-2876 ◽  
Author(s):  
John J. Koker

2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 669-671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiran S. Kedlaya ◽  
Liang Xiao

The statement of Theorem 2.7.6 in the indicated paper is incorrect. For instance, if m = 0 (i.e., the base field K contains no additional derivations), it is inconsistent with Theorem 2.7.4 due to the distinction between intrinsic and extrinsic generic radii of convergence. Theorems 2.7.12 and 2.7.13 are incorrect for similar reasons.


2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 823-852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Neshitov

Given a field $k$ of characteristic zero and $n\geqslant 0$, we prove that $H_{0}(\mathbb{Z}F(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}_{k}^{\bullet },\mathbb{G}_{m}^{\wedge n}))=K_{n}^{MW}(k)$, where $\mathbb{Z}F_{\ast }(k)$ is the category of linear framed correspondences of algebraic $k$-varieties, introduced by Garkusha and Panin [The triangulated category of linear framed motives $DM_{fr}^{eff}(k)$, in preparation] (see [Garkusha and Panin, Framed motives of algebraic varieties (after V. Voevodsky), Preprint, 2014, arXiv:1409.4372], § 7 as well), and $K_{\ast }^{MW}(k)$ is the Milnor–Witt $K$-theory of the base field $k$.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document