Reducing the Cost Effects of Local Land Use Controls

1981 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
David E. Dowall
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin Stewart Mauldin

This chapter explores the ecological regime of slavery and the land-use practices employed by farmers across the antebellum South. Despite the diverse ecologies and crop regimes of the region, most southern farmers employed a set of extensive agricultural techniques that kept the cost of farming down and helped circumvent natural limits on crop production and stock-raising. The use of shifting cultivation, free-range animal husbandry, and slaves to perform erosion control masked the environmental impacts of farmers’ actions, at least temporarily. Debates over westward expansion during the sectional crisis of the 1850s were not just about the extension of slavery, they also reflected practical concerns regarding access to new lands and fresh soil. Both were necessary for the continued profitability of farming in the South.


1975 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 751
Author(s):  
Robert Warren ◽  
David Listokin ◽  
W. Patrick Beaton ◽  
Franklin J. James ◽  
James W. Hughes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  

1986 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle J. White ◽  
William A. Fischel

Water Law ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 267-271
Author(s):  
William Goldfarb

1989 ◽  
pp. 178-179
Author(s):  
Brian W. Blaesser ◽  
Clyde W. Forrest ◽  
Douglas W. Kmiec ◽  
Daniel R. Mandelker ◽  
Alan C. Weinstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  

2021 ◽  
pp. 176-187
Author(s):  
Gerald A. Fisher
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  

Land ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Lestrelin ◽  
Jean-Christophe Castella ◽  
Qiaohong Li ◽  
Thoumthone Vongvisouk ◽  
Nguyen Dinh Tien ◽  
...  

Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) is viewed as an effective way to mitigate climate change by compensating stewards of forested areas for minimizing forestland conversion and protecting forest services. Opportunity costs assess the cost of foregone opportunity when preserving the forest instead of investing in an alternative activity or resource use. This paper questions the calculation method of opportunity costs using averaged economic benefits and co-benefits of different land-use transitions. We propose a nested approach to land-use transitions at the interface between landscapes and livelihoods and assessing a wide range of potential socio-ecological costs and benefits. Combining household surveys and focus groups with participatory mapping, we applied the approach in villages of Laos, Vietnam and China positioned along a broad transition trajectory from subsistence shifting cultivation to intensive commercial agriculture. By looking beyond the economics of land use, we highlight important linkages between land-use changes and livelihood differentiation, vulnerability and inequalities. Our results show the importance of addressing the impacts of land-use transitions on a wide range of potential ecological and socioeconomic costs and benefits at multiple levels.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document