The efficacy of platelet rich plasma on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Platelets ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Zheng-Tao Lv ◽  
Jin-Ming Zhang ◽  
Zhi-Ying Pang ◽  
Zhe Wang ◽  
Jun-Ming Huang ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenfan Gan ◽  
Zheng Xu ◽  
Chunmei Wu ◽  
Junzhi He

Abstract Background: Recently, a number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have researched the efficacy of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Therefore, we updated a systematic review based on these RCTs to evaluate the effects of PRP on knee function and pain with different time.Methods: We searched in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science(WOS), China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI), and WANFANG DATABASE, for human RCTs comparing the efficacy of intraarticular injection with no injection of PRP. Descriptive summaries and quality assessments were performed for all studies included in this meta-analysis. The outcomes of the stydy included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and Lysholm score.Results: Finally, we included 6 RCTs stydies, involving 315 patients. The control group consisted of blank group or placebo group. Follow-up periods ranged from 3 to 18 months. The results of bias risk assessment showed that all the 6 stuydies are unclear risk of bias. Compared with the control group, PRP group significantly improved IKDC score at 3, 6 and 12 months after operation (P = 0.00, 0.01, respectively). Lysholm score and VAS score also has significant differences at 3 months after operation (both P = 0.00).Conclusion: Our study has proved that PRP was more effective in the recovery of knee function and early pain relief after the ACLR than the ACLR alone. Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42021224182. Registered 6 April 2021. Keywords:anterior cruciate ligament injury; anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; platelet rich plasma; system review; META analysisReview registration: PROSPERO CRD42021224182. Registered 6 April 2021.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Wang ◽  
Ziming Liu ◽  
Yuwan Li ◽  
Yihang Peng ◽  
Wei Xu ◽  
...  

Purpose. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence that aims at comparing the clinical outcomes of remnant-preserving anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and standard ACLR. Methods. A systematic review of randomized controlled studies and cohort studies comparing remnant-preserving ACLR with standard ACLR with a minimum level of evidence of II was performed. Studies were included by strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Extracted data were summarized as preoperative conditions, postoperative clinical outcomes, and postoperative complications. When feasible, meta-analysis was performed with RevMan5.3 software. Study methodological quality was evaluated with the modified Coleman methodology score (CMS). Results. Eleven studies (n = 466 remnant-preserving and n = 536 standard) met the inclusion criteria. The mean modified CMS for all included studies was 85.8 (range: 77–92 on a 100-point scale). In total, 466 patients underwent remnant-preserving ACLR by 3 different procedures: standard ACLR plus tibial remnant tensioning (n = 283), selective-bundle augmentation (n = 49), and standard ACLR plus tibial remnant sparing (n = 134). Remnant-preserving ACLR provided a superior outcome of postoperative knee anterior stability (WMD = −0.42, 95% CI, −0.66, −0.17; P<0.01) and Lysholm score (WMD = 2.01, 95% CI, 0.53 to 3.50; P<0.01). There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to second-look arthroscopy (OR = 1.38, 95% CI, 0.53, 3.62; P=0.51), complications (OR = 1.24 95% CI, 0.76, 2.02; P=0.39), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subject scores, IKDC grades, Lachman test, and pivot-shift test. Summary/conclusion. Remnant-preserving ACLR promotes similar graft synovial coverage and revascularization to standard ACLR. Equivalent or superior postoperative knee stability and clinical scores were observed for remnant-preserving ACLR compared with standard ACLR. No significant difference in the total complication rate between the groups was evident.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document