The impact of cross-border mergers and acquisitions on competitors’ innovation: evidence from Chinese firms

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Huimin Xiao
Keyword(s):  
Mergers And Acquisitions ◽  
Chinese Firms ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals China's Cross-border Mergers and Acquisitions: A Contextual Distance Perspective

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 449-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiatao Li ◽  
Guoguang Wan
Keyword(s):  
Mergers And Acquisitions ◽  
Host Country ◽  
Large Dataset ◽  
Chinese Firms ◽  
Research Attention ◽  
Global Policy ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Political Risks ◽  
Greenfield Investments ◽  
Institutional Contexts

Outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) by Chinese firms has received considerable research attention recently (Li, Cui, & Lu, 2014; Lu, Liu, Wright, & Filatotchev, 2014; Xia, Ma, Lu, & Yiu, 2014). In particular, a number of studies have focused on cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&As) involving Chinese firms (Li, Li, & Wang, 2016; Li & Xie, 2013; Xie & Li, 2016; Zhang, Zhou, & Ebbers, 2011). Following Child and Marinova's (2014) suggestion that both the home and host country institutional contexts play important roles in determining M&A activity, Buckley and his colleagues have examined how China's ‘Go Global’ policy influences the location choices in Chinese acquisitions and also how host country political risks affect such activities (Buckley et al., 2016). They looked into national political and legal conditions (see also Meyer, Estrin, Bhaumik, & Peng, 2009), and also examined a large dataset on China's cross-border M&As. Much of the previous work in this area has focused on greenfield investments (Duanmu, 2012; Kang & Jiang, 2012), so the work of Buckley et al. (2016) has broken new ground.

scholarly journals What Drives Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions and Greenfield Foreign Direct Investment Capital Flows? Reconsideration in the Case of the Selected Former Yugoslav Countries

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 234-246
Author(s):  
Ksenija Denčić-Mihajlov ◽  
Vinko Lepojević ◽  
Jovana Stojanović
Keyword(s):  
Mergers And Acquisitions ◽  
Developing Economies ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Foreign Direct Investments ◽  
Macroeconomic Factors ◽  
Fdi Inflows ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Data Framework ◽  
The Impact

Bearing in mind the different nature and the impact of various types of foreign direct investments (FDI) on the one hand, and the specific macroeconomic environment in the post-socialist countries on the other hand, in this paper we reexamine the selected macroeconomic factors that affect the two types of FDI inflows (cross-border mergers and acquisitions and greenfield FDI) in four countries of the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. The study employs the balanced panel data framework and covers twelve-year period (2006-2017). Having performed the Hausman test, we use the random effect model and provide evidence that: (1) the key FDI macroeconomic determinants in stable business conditions, examined in numerous research studies, can have a different impact on FDI in times characterized by unstability and financial crisis, (2) some determinants of FDI inflows have different importance and direction in the case of cross-border M&A and greenfield FDI. Our findings are relevant for policymakers who should reconsider the key factors that fuel the FDI inflows towards their developing economies.

scholarly journals The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Location’s Choice of Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Carril-Caccia ◽  
Juliette Milgran Baleix
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Policy ◽  
Mergers And Acquisitions ◽  
Environmental Regulation ◽  
Gravity Model ◽  
Institutional Quality ◽  
Emerging Countries ◽  
Extensive Margin ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
High Level ◽  
The Impact

This study contributes to the literature seeking to test the pollution haven’s hypothesis (PHH), by focusing on the influence of environmental policy on the location’s decision of cross-border Mergers and Acquisitions (M&As). To this end, we estimate a gravity model using an original bilateral database for the extensive margin of M&A among 34 developed and emerging countries during the period 1995-2015. Reached evidence confirms only part of the pessimist predictions. A more stringent environmental regulation would not boost outward M&As to the extent that it originates from countries with relatively good institutional quality. In contrast, in countries with relatively high level of corruption, the laxer the environmental regulation, the higher the number of inward M&As. However, reducing corruption can compensate the competitiveness losses associated with the compliance of a stricter environmental regulation

Does the origin matter? The effects of cross-border mergers and acquisitions in France

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Carril-Caccia
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Direct Investment ◽  
Mergers And Acquisitions ◽  
Direct Investment ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Emerging Countries ◽  
Intangible Asset ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
The Impact

PurposeThe present article analyses the effects of cross-border mergers and acquisitions (CBM&As) on targets' total factor productivity (TFP), employment, wages and intangible-asset investment. The author investigates whether the impact of CBM&As differs depending on the origin of the investing multinational (MNE). The author distinguishes between CBM&As from European countries, other developed countries and emerging countries.Design/methodology/approachThe author makes use of a unique firm-level data set of foreign direct investment in the French manufacturing sector. The authors applies propensity score matching and difference in differences to estimate the effect of CBM&As.FindingsThe results show that the consequences of CBM&As differ strongly depending on the origin. CBM&As from European MNEs have a positive impact on TFP, wages and intangible-asset investment, and those from emerging countries seem to increase wages and intangible-asset investments. In contrast, CBM&As that originate from MNEs from other developed countries do not have a significant effect.Originality/valueThis article contributes to the growing literature on the effects of foreign direct investment that highlights the relevance of accounting for the MNEs' origin. In particular, it is the first to address the impact of emerging-country MNEs' CBM&As in Europe.

The long-term performance of cross-border mergers and acquisitions

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 385-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sai Lan ◽  
Fan Yang ◽  
Hong Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Mergers And Acquisitions ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Performance Outcomes ◽  
Chinese Firms ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Study Methodology ◽  
Long Term Performance ◽  
Term Performance

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine Chinese firms’ long-term value creation derived from cross-border mergers and acquisitions (CBMAs). Design/methodology/approach – The authors collected a sample of 140 CBMAs conducted by Chinese firms listed in Shenzhen and Shanghai stock markets between 1997 and 2010. Long-horizon event study methodology was used to test hypotheses. Findings – The authors find Chinese firms gain long-term value from CBMAs. In particular, the authors find that Chinese firms tend to gain more value from targets from developed countries, and Chinese state-owned firms are more capable of gaining value from CBMAs than Chinese private firms. Originality/value – Given Chinese firms are increasingly acquiring targets outside of China in recent years, it is still unclear about whether Chinese firms gain value from these very expensive cross-border deals. This is one of the first studies that address the question: What are the long-term performance outcomes of Chinese CBMAs in recent years?

Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions by Chinese Firms: value creation or value destruction?

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (97) ◽  
pp. 130-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xianming Wu ◽  
Xingrui Yang ◽  
Haibin Yang ◽  
Hao Lei
Keyword(s):  
Mergers And Acquisitions ◽  
Value Creation ◽  
Chinese Firms ◽  
Cross Border
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document