scholarly journals What does gender got to do with it? PMSCs and privatization of security revisited

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-28
Author(s):  
Jutta Joachim ◽  
Andrea Schneiker
2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 17-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Gutiérrez Sanín ◽  
Ana María Jaramillo

2020 ◽  
pp. 0095327X2092747
Author(s):  
Ori Swed ◽  
Daniel Burland

Corporate privatization of security has generated a neoliberal iteration of an old profession: the private military contractor. This development has revolutionized security policies across the globe while reviving old patterns of inequality. Following neoliberal logic, outsourcing fosters two types of employment: the exploitative and the exclusive. The first refers to low-status individuals hired en masse to perform menial labor; the second refers to experts who perform functions central to the employer’s mission. We contribute to this discussion by focusing on the qualifications of a different subsample of this industry: American contractors who died while performing military and security functions in Iraq. We assert that such American employees directly engaged in mission-essential combat and security functions better fit the employment category of an exclusive, expert sector at the core of the private military industry.


Author(s):  
Math Noortmann ◽  
Juliette Koning

This chapter discusses the normative complexity of private security. It formulates a critique of the stigmatization of private security companies and of the emphasis in the literature on the limitations of legal regulation, highlighting the role of self-regulation in the form of corporate ethics and (international) branch standards. Based on a review of scholarly literature, (inter)national cases, and examples from fieldwork in South Africa, the chapter captures the growing plurality of actors and voices in a vastly diversifying private security sector. In order to overcome the traditional bias regarding private security and its corporate sector, the authors advocate an organizational anthropological approach to uncover regulatory alternatives and the ethical and normative diversity that is essential to a comprehensive understanding of the privatization of security.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document