Evaluating Animal-Assisted Therapy in Group Treatment for Child Sexual Abuse

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 665-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracy J. Dietz ◽  
Diana Davis ◽  
Jacquelyn Pennings
2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 304-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grace S. Hubel ◽  
Christopher Campbell ◽  
Tiffany West ◽  
Samantha Friedenberg ◽  
Alayna Schreier ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 168-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rayleen V. de Luca ◽  
Debby A. Boyes ◽  
Patricia Furer ◽  
Alana D. Grayston ◽  
Diane Hiebert-Murphy

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 217-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay Liotta ◽  
Craig Springer ◽  
Justin R. Misurell ◽  
Jennifer Block-Lerner ◽  
David Brandwein

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atara Hiller ◽  
Craig Springer ◽  
Justin Misurell ◽  
Amy Kranzler ◽  
Shireen Rizvi

1999 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-205
Author(s):  
Megan Cleary

In recent years, the law in the area of recovered memories in child sexual abuse cases has developed rapidly. See J.K. Murray, “Repression, Memory & Suggestibility: A Call for Limitations on the Admissibility of Repressed Memory Testimony in Abuse Trials,” University of Colorado Law Review, 66 (1995): 477-522, at 479. Three cases have defined the scope of liability to third parties. The cases, decided within six months of each other, all involved lawsuits by third parties against therapists, based on treatment in which the patients recovered memories of sexual abuse. The New Hampshire Supreme Court, in Hungerford v. Jones, 722 A.2d 478 (N.H. 1998), allowed such a claim to survive, while the supreme courts in Iowa, in J.A.H. v. Wadle & Associates, 589 N.W.2d 256 (Iowa 1999), and California, in Eear v. Sills, 82 Cal. Rptr. 281 (1991), rejected lawsuits brought by nonpatients for professional liability.


2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 291-307
Author(s):  
Tony Ward ◽  
Stephen M. Hudson

1990 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1096-1096
Author(s):  
Marilyn T. Erickson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document