UK IPO underpricing and venture capitalists

2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 421-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerry Coakley ◽  
Leon Hadass ◽  
Andrew Wood
Author(s):  
Shiyang Huang ◽  
Yifei Mao ◽  
Cong (Roman) Wang ◽  
Dexin Zhou

Abstract We investigate the effect of pre-IPO investments by public market institutional investors (institutions) on the exit of venture capitalists (VCs). Results indicate that institutions’ pre-IPO investments reduce IPO underpricing by mitigating VCs’ reliance on all-star analysts to boost market liquidity. We conclude that institutions facilitate VC exits in the secondary market. Supporting this view, our analysis reveals that the presence of institutions allows VCs to exit with a reduced price impact in the secondary market. Consistent with the ease of exit, VCs offer fewer shares at the IPO and are more likely to invest in institutionally backed startups.


2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 1017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyojik Song ◽  
Young-Soo Choi ◽  
Jong Eun Lee

This paper re-examines the role of commercial banks, investment banks, and venture capitalists in monitoring and certifying the value of the firms that went public in the 2000s. We find that investment banks that have better reputations are associated with larger underpricing for venture-capital-backed IPOs, but not for non-venture-capital-backed IPOs. The partial adjustment phenomenon observed in Carter et al. (2001) exists only for venture-capital-backed IPOs. The presence of venture capital is inversely related to IPO underpricing only when venture capitalists certify small firms. We do not find that the presence of bank debt reduces IPO underpricing. In addition, we do not find any substitutive or complementary role between commercial banks and venture capitalists in certifying IPOs.


2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
George Kanatas ◽  
Christodoulos Stefanadis

Abstract We show that partnering with venture capitalists may be a curse to entrepreneurs in that it reduces their profits in the commercialization phase. Agents rationally infer that a likely reason an entrepreneur who has received managerial assistance (from a venture capitalist) refrains from a lucrative IPO and instead opts for an acquisition may be the low quality of his technology (which is unfixable), rather than of his management (which may be fixable). This leads to lower acquisition prices and greater IPO underpricing. From a social welfare standpoint, venture capital services are under-utilized and technologies are under-commercialized.


CFA Digest ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 80-80
Author(s):  
William H. Sackley
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manapol Ekkayokkaya ◽  
Tulaya Pengniti

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document