scholarly journals Could autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation be considered a second-line treatment option in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis? A critical editorial

Author(s):  
Emanuele D’Amico ◽  
Salvatore Cottone
2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 676-678 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Portaccio ◽  
M.P. Amato ◽  
G. Siracusa ◽  
F. Pagliai ◽  
S. Sorbi ◽  
...  

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) has been proposed as a rescue treatment in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients not responding to first- or second-line therapies. To date, most of the treated cases had a secondary progressive disease course. However, patients with high inflammatory activity, but no secondary progression of the disease, could be candidates to take greater advantage of AHSCT. In this paper, we report two cases with very active, relapsing-remitting (RR) MS, who underwent AHSCT, and obtained a dramatic resolution to disease activity. Multiple Sclerosis 2007; 13: 676-678. http://msj.sagepub.com


2019 ◽  
Vol 77 (8) ◽  
pp. 531-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth R. Comini-Frota ◽  
Bruna C. C. Marques ◽  
Caio Torres ◽  
Karoline M. S. Cohen ◽  
Eduardo Carvalho Miranda

ABSTRACT Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated disease of the central nervous system. Its treatment has focused on inflammation control as early as possible to avoid disability. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) has been used for treating MS since 1996, with recent decisive results regarding benefits in long-term efficacy. Five patients followed up at an MS center in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, who had relapsing-remitting MS with high disease activity, underwent AHSCT between 2009 and 2011. They were evaluated clinically, with magnetic resonance imaging, and by the EDSS every six months after transplantation, up to July 2018. The patients were four women and one man, with ages ranging from 25-50 years, and time since disease onset ranging from 4-17 years at the time of the procedure. Four patients improved, one patient was stabilized, and all patients were free of disease activity after 5-9 years. Through improving patient selection and decreasing the time from disease onset, AHSCT could stop epitope spreading and disease progression. Despite multiple other therapeutic choices being approved for relapsing-remitting MS, AHSCT continues to be a treatment to consider for aggressive MS disease.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 204062072092104
Author(s):  
Ja Min Byun ◽  
Sung-Soo Yoon ◽  
Youngil Koh ◽  
Chang-Ki Min ◽  
Jae Hoon Lee ◽  
...  

Background: Traditionally believed to be an integral part of multiple myeloma (MM) treatment, the role of hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) is being challenged. As such, we sought to evaluate the impact of HSCT in the era of novel agents. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective, longitudinal cohort study was carried out between January 2016 and December 2018. A total of 55 patients who received VTD (bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone) as first-line treatment and KRd (carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone) as second-line treatment were analyzed for outcomes. Results: The enrolled patients were divided into Group 1, defined as those who continued KRd treatment until progression ( n = 41), versus Group 2, defined as those who underwent HSCT after a certain number of cycles of KRd ( n = 14). Both groups showed a generally favorable response to KRd, with overall response rate (ORR) of 87.9% and clinical benefit rate of 92.8% after a median of seven cycles in Group 1, and ORR 92.8% and clinical benefit rate 100% after median of five cycles in Group 2. However, significantly poorer progression-free survival (PFS) ( p = 0.004) was observed in Group 1 (median 12 months) compared with Group 2 (median not reached). Multivariate analyses identified HSCT after KRd as potential risk factors associated with PFS. Also, in Group 1, bortezomib refractoriness was associated with significantly shorter PFS compared with those who were responsive (median 12 months versus 14 months, respectively, p = 0.039). Conclusions: In conclusion, even with the advent of novel agents, HSCT still remains a valuable treatment modality with additive efficacy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document