What Is 'Normal'? An Evolution-Theoretic Foundation for Normic Laws and Their Relation to Statistical Normality

2001 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 476-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerhard Schurz
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Gunnar Schumann

AbstractI critically discuss Gerhard Schurz’ improved version of Hempel’s covering law model as the model appropriate for human action explanation in the historical sciences. Schurz takes so-called “normic laws” as the best means to save Hempel’s covering law model from the objection that there are no strict laws in historiography. I criticize Schurz approach in two respects: 1) Schurz falsely takes Dray’s account of historical explanations to be a normic law account. 2) Human action explanation in terms of goals and means-ends-beliefs are not based on normic laws at all, for the explanandum (the action) in an explanation follows from the volitional and doxastic premises (the explanans) alone. To show this, I argue that there is a conceptual connection between volition and action, rooted in our actual usage of volitional concepts. Ultimately, a difference in principle between the methods of explanation in science and historiography has to be acknowledged.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document