scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2022 ◽  
Vol 2152 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Email Address ◽  
Minor Revision ◽  
Check System ◽  
Final Acceptance

The Organiser and/or the Editor(s) are required to declare details about their peer review processes. Therefore, please provide the following information: • Type of peer review: Double-blind Double-anonymous: author and reviewer identities are hidden to each other • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? The submission will first be reviewed for its topic and length, then go through an originality check. The peer-review process will begin soon after the paper is found to be qualified. The paper will be sent to have a double-blind peer review by 2 reviewers. They will judge the paper based on the theme, coverage, innovation, integrity, depth, and language. One of the final acceptance suggestions including: Accept, Accept with Minor Revision, Major Revision, Reject will be given. Articles can be resubmitted after revision except receiving Reject. • Conference submission management system: https://registration.confmcee.org/ • Number of submissions received: 179 • Number of submissions sent for review: 179 • Number of submissions accepted: 64 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received × 100): 35.8% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 35 • Any additional info on review process (eg Plagiarism check system): Plagiarism check system: iThenticate • Contact person for queries (Full name, affiliation, institutional email address) Han Gao, [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2063 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Related Research ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Research Areas ◽  
Scientific Standards

Abstract All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: google website https://sites.google.com/uobasrah.edu.iq/3rd-ivccbasrah/english Online Conference Email: [email protected] • Number of submissions received: 65 • Number of submissions sent for review: 47 • Number of submissions accepted: 31 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 47.7% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2-3 Reviewers • Total number of reviewers involved: 35 • Any additional info on review process: The papers were received was evaluated using Turnitin software at Basrah University. Then the papers were sent to the reviewers of related research areas for peer-review process. The referees gave their decision (acceptance or acceptance after revisions or rejection). Rejected papers were sent back to the authors. The accepted papers by two reviewers were sent for the publications. • Contact person for queries: Prof. Dr. Salah Shaker Hashim, Dept. of Chemistry, College of Science, University of Basrah, [email protected] Mobile No.: 00964 774 070 8188

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 913 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Similarity Index ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Email Address ◽  
Double Blind Method ◽  
Institution Selection

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: The peer review process was conducted with double-blind method by 2 reviewers per article. • Conference submission management system: Email address used for manuscript management system is [email protected] • Number of submissions received: 180 • Number of submissions sent for review: 125 • Number of submissions accepted: 111 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 61.67% • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 rounds of review process • Total number of reviewers involved: 12 reviewers • Any additional info on review process: In detail, the submitted papers were checked for their plagiarism similarity index with Turn it in software. Any manuscript with similarity index above 25% will be returned to the author for revision. The peer-review process was conducted by involving internal reviewers from University of Mataram who has scopus H-index ≥ 3. In addition, external reviewers were also involved from other universities and institution. Selection of the reviewers was conducted based on the suitability of the reviewer expertise and the subtopic of the paper. The first decision whether the paper is rejected or required for revision is sent in approximately 4 days. The comments from the reviewer are concluded by the editor in chief to reject or accept the paper. • Contact person for queries: Eka Sunarwidhi Prasedya, Ph.D. University of Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2083 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Chief Editor ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Final Decision ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Related Area ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Email Address

All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information: • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: https://editorone.org/conferences/5fd6b50f5187a?conf=ICAPC2021 The email address used for the management system and the name of the person in charge as follows Affiliation: Guilin Normal College Email: [email protected] Name: Zhiyong Shao • Number of submissions received: 591 • Number of submissions sent for review: 498 • Number of submissions accepted: 369 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 62% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 125 • Any additional info on review process: Step 1. Selected papers divided into several parts according to their topics. Step 2. Authors names, affiliations and email addresses removed from papers. Step 3. Papers sent to the reviewers who are professional in the related area for peer review. Step 4. Papers sent back to the writer if two reviewers reject the same paper, papers sent for publication if two reviewers accept the same paper, and if two reviewers disagree on the same paper, the paper will be sent to the chief editor for final decision. Step 5. Authors revise their paper according to the reviewers’ comments. • Contact person for queries (please include: name, affiliation, institutional email address) Name: Zhiyong Shao Affiliation: Guilin Normal College Email: [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 891 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Due Date ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Scientific Standards

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: Every author who wants to publish their paper must carry out a peer review process by registering at the OJS provided by the committee • Number of submissions received: 38 • Number of submissions sent for review: 31 submission was sent for review and the rest did not join the review process because they could not submit the paper on the due date • Number of submissions accepted: 29 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): (29/38x100%) = 76,31 % • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 times • Total number of reviewers involved: 17 • Any additional info on review process: none • Contact person for queries: Name : Andi Tri Lestari Affiliation: Depatment of Forestry, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Mataram Email : atlestari @unram.ac.id

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 881 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Blind Review ◽  
Email Address ◽  
Conference Management ◽  
The University ◽  
Single Blind

Abstract All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information: • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) All papers were subjected for review in term of format and appropriate contents by two independent reviewers (double-blind review) • Conference submission management system: For official information, we develop using the University platform: http://icrp.unsyiah.ac.id/id, while for paper submission, We used the EasyChair conference management system: https://easychair.org/my/conference?conf=icrp2021 • Number of submissions received: In total, we received 106 submitted papers through submission system • Number of submissions sent for review: A total of 82 papers were sent to the reviewers, while 24 submission paper were rejected due to irrelevant topics and not full paper submissions (abstract only). • Number of submissions accepted: A total of 69 papers were accepted for presentations and publication on ICRP 2021. • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): Acceptance rate = 65% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2x for major revisions and 1x for minor revisions • Total number of reviewers involved: 32 reviewers • Any additional info on review process: The review process were carried out by assigning two potential respective reviewers by track editors. The review itself approximately took maximum 3 weeks to complete. • Contact person for queries: (please include name, affiliation and email address) Dr.-Ing. Agus Arip Munawar ([email protected]) Dr. Cut Dewi ([email protected]) Dept. of Architecture and Planning, Syiah Kuala University Jl. T Syekh Abdul Rauf No. 7 Banda Aceh – Indonesia Email: [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 748 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
Check System ◽  
Scientific Standards

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? Yes for accepting papers but no for declining papers. • Conference submission management system: Edas System (https://edas.info/27558 or https://acifas2020.edas.info/) • Number of submissions received: 122 • Number of submissions sent for review: 98 • Number of submissions accepted: 44 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 44.89 % • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 • Total number of reviewers involved: 65 • Any additional info on review process (ie plagiarism check system): Yes, we used the application embedded with Edas system and Turninithin application for final check. • Contact person for queries: Arjon Turnip Universitas Padjadjaran [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 889 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Conference Proceeding ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Blind Review ◽  
Email Address ◽  
Scientific Standards

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind. The Conference Proceeding uses double-blind review, which means that both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process. The manuscripts were handled by three Editors (details as under) and the reviewers were selected based on area of expertise. The email address used for the management system is [email protected] Person in charge/details of Manuscripts handled by editors: I. Submissions handled by Dr Sandeep Singh - 123 II. Submissions handled by Dr Jasgurpreet Singh - 122 III. Submissions handled by Dr Raman Kumar - 100 • Conference submission management system: Via Easy Chair and Conference Official email address. • Number of submissions received: 345 • Number of submissions sent for review: 176 • Number of submissions accepted: 85 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): [(85/345)*100] = 24.6 • Average number of reviews per paper: 02 • Total number of reviewers involved: 44 • Any additional info on review process: NA • Contact person for queries: Name : Dr. Sandeep Singh Affiliation: Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali Email : [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2090 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Associate Professor ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Management ◽  
Check System ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? • Conference submission management system: IDAS Conference management System • Number of submissions received: 336 • Number of submissions sent for review: 315 • Number of submissions accepted: 189 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 56.25% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: more than 600 • Any additional info on review process (ie plagiarism check system): We use Turnitin system for plagiarism checking • Contact person for queries: Dimitrios Vlachos Associate Professor, University of Peloponnese Email: [email protected] Tel: +30 6944 371526

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 893 (1) ◽  
pp. 011003
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
Scientific Standards

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: we develop our submission system where the editors, the authors and the reviewers can access using their unique login password. • Number of submissions received: 311 abstracts • Number of submissions sent for review: 241 abstracts • Number of submissions accepted: 81 articles • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 26% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 reviews • Total number of reviewers involved: 34 reviewers • Any additional info on review process: - • Contact person for queries: Name : Dr Supari Affiliation : Center for Climate Change Informastion, Agency for Meteorology, Climatology and Geophysics Email : [email protected]; [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2077 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
Technical University ◽  
Scientific Standards

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: - • Number of submissions received: 38 • Number of submissions sent for review: 38 • Number of submissions accepted: 25 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 65,8 % • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 23 • Any additional info on review process: • Contact person for queries: Name : Pozdeeva Ekaterina Affiliation: Engineer, State Marine Technical University, St.-Petersburg Email : [email protected]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document