In Situ SWL of Ureteral Stones: Comparison Between an Electrohydraulic and an Electromagnetic Shockwave Source

2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 209-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geert G. Tailly
Keyword(s):  
1995 ◽  
Vol 62 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 100-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Frego ◽  
M. Scanzi ◽  
B. Taher ◽  
M. Tosana ◽  
S. Cosciani Cunico

— 185 patients with ureteral stones were treated with ESWL (118 with lumbar ureteral stones, 63 pelvic, 4 sacroiliac). 182 patients (98.3%) were treated with ESWL in-situ by means of a Dornier MFL-5000 lithotriptor. Stone size varied from 0.6 to 1.4 cm (mean 0.9 cm); 145 patients (86.9%) were stone-free after one treatment. The re-treatment rate was 13% for lumbar ureteral stones, 25% for sacroiliac and 12.5% for pelvic stones. We report no complications. 11 patients (6.04%) had to be treated subsequently with ureteroscopic fragmentation and 4 (2.19%) with open surgery. We conclude that in-situ ESWL is also a safe and effective treatment for distal ureteral stones, for which ureteroscopy is also a successful technique but with higher morbidity, and should therefore be performed in case of failure of ESWL. We have more chance of success if the in-situ treatment is performed as soon as possible.


1991 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
JAMES B. NAIDICH ◽  
RONA W. GREENBERG ◽  
FOTI C. BENETOS ◽  
FELIX L. BADILLO ◽  
ROBERT S. WALDBAUM

1997 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean D. Doublet ◽  
Kessile Tchala ◽  
Mohamed Tligui ◽  
Calin Ciofu ◽  
Bernard Gattegno ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document