VS01.09: ROBOTIC MCKEOWN ESOPHAGECTOMY: LESSONS LEARNED AFTER 50 CASES

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 45-46
Author(s):  
Rubens Sallum ◽  
Flavio Takeda ◽  
Marco Santo ◽  
Andre Duarte ◽  
Ivan Cecconello
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Azygos Vein ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy ◽  
Recurrent Nerve ◽  
Cervical Anastomosis ◽  
Robotic Arms ◽  
Mckeown Esophagectomy

Abstract Description Authors show the lessons learned after 50 robotic esophagectomies: the new positioning of the 4 robotic arms in the thorax avoiding collisions, fixation of the arches of the azygos vein arch (after section) and retraction of the trachea allowing the dissection of the left recurrent nerve lymph nodal chain, especially within the aortic arch. Abdominal dissection and cervical anastomosis are also presented. The film end with the results compared to Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

PS02.069: CERVICAL GASTROPLASTY ANASTOMOSIS AFTER ESOPHAGECTOMY: INDOCYANINE GREEN FLUORESCENCE IMAGING EVALUATION AND TECHNICAL SURGICAL ASPECTS

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 140-140
Author(s):  
Flavio Takeda ◽  
Ulysses Ribeiro Jr ◽  
Rubens Sallum ◽  
Julio Mariano Rocha ◽  
Andre Duarte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Indocyanine Green ◽  
Fluorescence Imaging ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Visual Assessment ◽  
Gastric Conduit ◽  
Linear Stapler ◽  
Recurrent Nerve ◽  
Imaging Evaluation ◽  
Indocyanine Green Fluorescence ◽  
Surgical Aspects

Abstract Description One of the most frequent complication after esophagectomy is the anastomotic leakage, which is a determiming factor of morbidity and mortality after surgical treatment. The best location for the esophagogastric anastomosis (cervical or intra-thoracic) has been topic of discussion for many years, and surgical aspects as resected margins, recurrent nerve trauma and mainly the vascularization of the anastomosis. In this video we performed a cervical gastroplasty anastomosis (McKeown), side-to-side, stapled (linear stapler) with a thin gastric tube conduit, and after that we aimed to determine the feasibility and usefulness of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging to evaluate the gastric conduit perfusion during an esophagectomy. After pulling up the gastric conduit trhought the mediastinum and after performing the cervical anastomosis, 5 mg of ICG was in jected as a bolus and visual assessment of the blood supply of the gastric conduit was seen. This patient was a 63 years old, male, with adenocarcinoma of esophago-gastric junction (Siewert II) underwent to neoadjuvant quimiotherapy (FOLFOX regimen) and submitted after 3 cycles to esophagectomy (thoracoscopy and laparoscopy). No fistula was found in post operative follow-up, and either complications. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

VS02.06: ROBOTIC RE-DO GIANT HIATAL HERNIA WITH MESH

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 47-47
Author(s):  
Rubens Sallum ◽  
Flavio Takeda ◽  
Marco Santo ◽  
Ivan Cecconello
Keyword(s):  
Hiatal Hernia ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Barbed Suture ◽  
Ultrasonic Scalpel ◽  
Robotic Arms ◽  
Total Fundoplication ◽  
Giant Hiatal Hernia ◽  
Hiatal Repair

Abstract Description The authors present a video of reoperation of relapsed giant hiatal hérnia (twice). Tactics of static presentation of 2 robotic arms allowing safe dissection with 2 concomitant energy modalities: ultrasonic scalpel and bipolar. The endowrist movments allow intrathoracic safe dissection. The hiatal repair with barbed suture at different angles was followed by a biological U-shape mesh. Total fundoplication with 3 lines of suture and hiatal fixation are highlighted. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

History of Health Technology Assessment in Iran

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morteza Arab-Zozani ◽  
Mobin Sokhanvar ◽  
Edris Kakemam ◽  
Tahereh Didehban ◽  
Soheil Hassanipour
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
History Of ◽  
Systematic Structure ◽  
High Level

This article describes the characteristics of the health system and reviews the history of health technology assessment (HTA) in Iran, including its inception, processes, challenges, and lessons learned. This study was conducted by analyzing existing documents, reports, and guidelines related to HTA and published articles in the field. HTA in Iran has been established since the late 2000s and was first introduced as a secretariat by the Deputy of Health at the Ministry of Health and Medical Education. The mission of the HTA office is to systematically assess technologies to improve evidence-informed decision making. Despite its 10 years of existence, HTA in Iran still faces some challenges. The most pressing problems currently facing HTA in Iran include conflicts of interest among researchers performing the HTAs, the absence of a systematic structure for identifying and introducing new technologies, the lack of interest in HTA results among high-level policy makers, and the lack of external oversight for HTA projects.

Transverse Aortic Arch Transection in a Polytrauma Patient—Challenges Faced and Lessons Learned

2020 ◽  
Vol 110 (6) ◽  
pp. e505-e507
Author(s):  
Shaji Palangadan ◽  
Manish Kumar Yadav ◽  
Subash Sundarsingh
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Polytrauma Patient

PS01.174: AN EXAMINATION OF OUTCOMES AFTER ANTE-THORACIC ROUTE WITH RIGHT HEMICOLON RECONSTRUCTION AFTER ESOPHAGECTOMY.

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 99-99
Author(s):  
Yuki Hirata ◽  
Hirofumi Kawakubo ◽  
Shuhei Mayanagi ◽  
Kazumasa Fukuda ◽  
Rieko Nakamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Gastric Tube ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Average Duration ◽  
Oral Intake ◽  
Recurrent Nerve ◽  
Nerve Paralysis ◽  
Recurrent Nerve Paralysis ◽  
Reconstruction Group ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background In our institute, we usually use gastric tube for reconstruction organ after esophagectomy. When we can’t use gastric tube, we use right hemi-colon with ante-thoracic route. Previously, we reconstructed by 1-step after esophagectomy, but from 2012, we have done by 2-step for reduce postoperative complications. Methods We enrolled 15 esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy and right hemicolon reconstruction between April 2004 and December 2016. Results The average age of 15 patients is 67.3. The reasons of using right hemicolon are as follows; post gastrectomy 13, stomach double cancer 2. The reasons of gastrectomy are as follows; gastric cancer 8, duodenum cancer 1, gastric ulcer 4. The average duration from gastrectomy to esophagectomy is 12.5 year. We reconstructed by 1-step for 5 patients, and after 2012, we reconstructed by 2-step for 10 patients. Anastomotic leakages were found in 2 cases (40.0%) in 1-step reconstruction group, and 3 cases (20.0%) in 2-step reconstruction group. In 1-step reconstruction group, 1 case occurred multiple anastomotic leakages and DIC, and another 1 case was found necrosis of reconstructive colon. In 2-step reconstruction group, we found 1 case of major leakage and 1 case of recurrent nerve paralysis and 2 cases of postoperative pneumonia. However, there were no case of tracheotomy. The incidence of pneumonia did not differ between the two groups. And the term of postoperative oral intake tend to shorter in 2-step reconstruction group (P = 0.06). 2 severe postoperative complications (Clavian-Dindo V or IVa) cases were found in 1-step reconstruction group, on the other hand, 2 cases severe complications (CD IIIa) in 2-step reconstruction group. Conclusion In the case of using right hemicolon as a reconstructive organ, 2-step reconstruction approach is useful and superior from the viewpoints of postoperative complications. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

VS01.04: RELIABLE SURGICAL TECHNIQUES FOR LYMPHADENECTOMY ALONG THE LEFT RECURRENT LARYNGEAL NERVE DURING THORACOSCOPIC ESOPHAGECTOMY IN THE PRONE POSITION

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 44-44
Author(s):  
Taro Oshikiri ◽  
Tetsu Nakamura ◽  
Hiroshi Hasegawa ◽  
Masashi Yamamoto ◽  
Shingo Kanaji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve ◽  
Prone Position ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Laryngeal Nerve ◽  
Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy ◽  
Left Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve

Abstract Description Background Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) in esophageal cancer is important for disease control but requires advanced dissection skills. Complete dissection of the lymph nodes along the left RLN in a safe manner is important. We demonstrate the reliable method for lymphadenectomy along the left RLN during thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position (TEP). Methods This procedure is performed for all of resectable thoracic esophageal cancers. The essence of this method is to recognize the lateral pedicle as a two-dimensional membrane that inclu replicatedes the left RLN, lymph nodes around the nerve, and primary esophageal arteries. By drawing the proximal portion of the divided esophagus and the lateral pedicle, identification and reliable cutting of the primary esophageal arteries and distinguishing the left RLN from the lymph nodes are simplified. Results We performed 46 TEPs for esophageal cancer using this method with no conversion to an open procedure in 2015 at Kobe University. No intraoperative morbidity related to the left RLN was observed. The mean number of harvested lymph nodes along the left RLN was 6.9 ± 4.2. Left RLN palsy greater than Clavien-Dindo classification grade II occurred in 4 patients (8%), all of them were reversible. The incidence of lymph node metastasis along the left RLN was 22%. Conclusion Our method for lymphadenectomy along the left RLN during TEP is safe and reliable. It has a low incidence of left RLN palsy and provides sufficient lymph node dissection along the left RLN. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

PS01.159: THE IMPROVED POSTOPERATIVE RECOVERY OUTCOMES FROM MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 94-94
Author(s):  
Xiaobin Zhang ◽  
Zhigang Li
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Anastomotic Leakage ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Postoperative Recovery ◽  
Open Group ◽  
Recurrent Nerve ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Open Esophagectomy

Abstract Background The minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has been developed in the past three decades. In our institution, the MIE was first introduced in 2012, and the proportion of MIE was used for over 70% in 2016–2017. This study aimed to compare the postoperative recovery outcomes between MIE and open esophagectomy in different period. Methods A total of 725 patients were enrolled in this study including 248 patients who underwent open esophagectomy within 2012–2013 and 477 patients who underwent MIE within 2016–2017. All patients received McKeown esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy. And the perioperative complications were recorded according to the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG) complication definitions. Results There was no statistically difference between OPEN and MIE groups with regard to preoperative characters except for age (60.8 ± 7.2 vs. 62.7 ± 7.7, P < 0.001) and body mass index (22.4 ± 3.0 vs. 23.1 ± 3.0, P = 0.002). One (0.2%) patient in the MIE group died within 90 days from anastomotic leakage, compared to 6 (2.4%) patients in the OPEN group (P = 0.004). The length of hospital stay was shorter in the MIE group (11 range 6–131 days, vs. 15 range 9–164 days, P < 0.001). The MIE group was in favor of lower complications (32.3% vs. 46.4%, P < 0.001). Pneumonia was the most common complications in both groups (12.6% in MIE vs. 27.4% in OPEN, P < 0.001). 15 (3.1%) patients in the MIE group experienced atrial arrhythmias compared with 30 (12.1%) in the OPEN group (P < 0.001). Lower anastomotic leakage was noted in the MIE group (11.5% vs. 25.4%, P < 0.001), as well as the wound infection (0.2% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.001), than in the OPEN group. The recurrent nerve injury was higher in the MIE group (11.7% vs. 6.5%, P = 0.024) but with more lymph nodes dissection along the recurrent laryngeal nerve (3.8 ± 2.8 vs. 1.4 ± 2.0, P < 0.001). Conclusion The MIE was associated with better postoperative recovery outcomes and lower mortality. MIE technique should be considered as the mainstay surgical treatment for esophageal cancer in the current and future period. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

PS01.114: HYBRID OPERATION IN TREATMENT OF TRAUMATIC AORTIC ARCH RUPTURE COMBINED WITH PSEUDOANEURYSM

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 82-82
Author(s):  
Shoujun Tang ◽  
Haining Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Psychiatric Symptoms ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Circulatory Arrest ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Dissecting Aneurysm ◽  
Anatomic Reconstruction ◽  
Hybrid Procedures ◽  
Hybrid Operation

Abstract Background Traumatic aortic arch rupture combined with pseudoaneurysm is a rare but life-threatening condition, on which limited reports exist. We describe the technique of one-stage hybrid open debranching and endovascular repair by using thoracic stent-graft devices deployed to cover the whole aortic arch to exclude pseudoaneurysm. Methods A 31-year-old male patient was admitted because of anterior chest pain with hoarseness. The patient had suffered from fractures in the femur, radius, rib, and sternum because of a traffic accident 3 months ago. He subsequently underwent femoral and radial internal fixation operations. Imageological examination revealed an aortic arch rupture with upper mediastinal pseudoaneurysm (4.0 cm × 4.8 cm × 5.0 cm) in Zone 1. A hybrid operation of debranching combined with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was performed. Postoperative angiography indicated that the aneurysm was isolated, and that the proximal stent presented no internal leakage or ‘beak-like’ change. Results Nervous and psychiatric symptoms did not appear after the operation.Follow-up results were positive at 7 days, 1 year, and > 2 years after operation. Computed tomography angiography of the chestshowed partially absorbed hematoma and smooth reconstruction of the blood vessels. Conclusion The hybrid operation of debranching combined with TEVAR expanded the indications of endovascular repair, providing a new treatment option for aortic dissecting aneurysm. Hybrid procedures avoid the need for CPB, aortic cross clamping, or hypothermic circulatory arrest. Hence, the operation (anatomical bypass) was simple, and the anatomic reconstruction required less work. This technique also avoids the tumor location; thus, the tumor body and the surrounding tissues were not pulled. In conclusion, we recommend hybrid repair of the aortic arch disease as an alternative treatment for patients who are at high surgical risks for conventional repair. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

PS01.219: SINGLE-PORT THORACOSCOPIC MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 112-112
Author(s):  
Yong Yuan
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Surgical Instruments ◽  
Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy

Abstract Background This study was conducted to optimize the surgical procedures for single-port thoracoscopic esophagectomy, and to explore its potential advantages over multi-port minimally invasive esophagectomy. Methods For single-port thoracoscopic esophagectomy, the patient was placed in left lateral-prone position and a 4-cm incision through the 4th-5th intercostal space was taken on the postaxillary line. The 10-mm camera and two or three surgical instruments were used for the VATS esophagectomy and radical mediastinal lymph node dissection. The camera position was different for the upper and lower mediastinal regions. Mobilization of stomach was conducted via multiple-port laparoscopic approach. Cervical end-to-side anastomosis was completed by hand-sewn procedures.A propensity-matched comparison was made between the single-port and four-port thoracoscopic esophagectomy groups. Results From 2014 to 2016, 56 matched patients were analyzed. There was no conversion to open surgery or operative mortality. The use of single-port thoracoscopic esophagectomy increased the length of operation time in comparison with using multiple-port minimally invasive technique (mean, 257 vs. 216 min, P = 0.026). The time taken for thoracic procedure in the single-port group was significant longer that in the multi-port group (mean, 126 vs. 84 min, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between groups in the number of lymph nodes dissected, blood loss, complications or hospital stay (P > 0.05). In single-port thoracoscopic group, the pain in the abdomen was more severe than that in the chest (P = 0.042). The pain scores for postoperative day 1 and day 7 were significantly lower in the single-port group as compared with multiple-port group (P = 0.038 and P < 0.001), a similar trend could be seen for the pain score on postoperative day 3 (P = 0.058). Conclusion Single-port thoracoscopic esophagectomy contributes to reducing postoperative pain with an acceptable increase of operation time, which does not compromise surgical radicality and has similar short-term postoperative outcomes when compared with multiple-port minimally invasive approach. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document