scholarly journals In-stent restenosis due to delayed healing of abluminal bioresorbable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: insight from histopathological evaluation with directional coronary atherectomy

Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Yamamoto ◽  
Naofumi Yoshida ◽  
Takeshi Kondo ◽  
Tomofumi Takaya

Abstract Histopathological evaluation of the in-stent restenosis (ISR) sample in this case suggested that the ISR was potentially caused by a polymer residue of the bioresorbable polymer everolimus-eluting stent.

1998 ◽  
Vol 82 (11) ◽  
pp. 1345-1351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nasser A Mahdi ◽  
Asad Z Pathan ◽  
Lari Harrell ◽  
Miltiadis N Leon ◽  
Julio Lopez ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro L. Sanchez ◽  
Maximo Rodriguez-Alemparte ◽  
Pedro J. Colon-Hernandez ◽  
Eugene Pomerantsev ◽  
Ignacio Inglessis ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
WERNER HABERBOSCH ◽  
WOLFGANG WAAS ◽  
BERND WALDECKER ◽  
HEINRICH HEIZMANN ◽  
HANS HÖLSCHERMANN ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Norihito Nakamura ◽  
Sho Torii ◽  
Hiroko Tsuchiya ◽  
Akihiko Nakano ◽  
Yuji Oikawa ◽  
...  

Background Dialysis is an independent risk factor for in‐stent restenosis (ISR) after stent implantation in coronary arteries. However, the characteristics of ISR in patients undergoing dialysis remain unclear, as there are no histological studies evaluating the causes of this condition. The aim of the present study was to investigate the causes of ISR between patients who are undergoing dialysis and those who are not by evaluating tissues obtained from ISR lesions using directional coronary atherectomy. Methods and Results A total of 29 ISR lesions from 29 patients included in a multicenter directional coronary atherectomy registry of 128 patients were selected for analysis and divided into a dialysis group (n=8) and a nondialysis group (n=21). Histopathological evaluation demonstrated that an in‐stent calcified nodule was a major histological characteristic of ISR lesions in the dialysis group and the prevalence of an in‐stent calcified nodule was significantly higher in the dialysis group compared with the nondialysis group (75% versus 5%, respectively; P <0.01). On the other hand, the prevalence of an in‐stent lipid‐rich plaque was significantly lower in the dialysis group compared with the nondialysis group (0% versus 43%, respectively; P =0.03). In all cases with an in‐stent calcified nodule, the underlying calcification before stent implantation was moderate to severe. When tissue characteristics were stratified according to duration post–stent implantation, an in‐stent calcified nodule in the dialysis group was mainly observed within 1 year after stent implantation. Conclusions In‐stent calcified nodules are a common cause of ISR in patients undergoing dialysis and are observed within 1 year after stent implantation, suggesting different causes of ISR between patients undergoing dialysis and those who are not.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document