P2694Early and late restenosis after excimer laser coronary angioplasty and paclitaxel-coated balloon combination therapy for drug-eluting stent restenosis

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Higaki ◽  
K Nishioka ◽  
K Suruga ◽  
H Takemoto ◽  
T Nakano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Excimer Laser ◽  
Coronary Angioplasty ◽  
Drug Eluting Stent ◽  
Stent Restenosis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Drug Eluting ◽  
Late Restenosis ◽  
Excimer Laser Coronary Angioplasty

Abstract Background Drug-eluting stent restenosis (DES-ISR) is associated with poorer outcomes than those of bare-metal stent restenosis after treatment with paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB), and late restenosis after PCB angioplasty for DES-ISR is a residual problem. Excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) is thought to be advantageous for ISR treatment by removing neointima. However, whether the combination of ELCA and PCB angioplasty is more effective than the use of PCB only angioplasty in DES-ISR has not been studied so far. Purpose We evaluated the efficacy of ELCA and PCB combination therapy for DES-ISR at mid-and late-term after revascularization. Methods From January 2014 to March 2016, 166 DES-ISR lesions were treated with ELCA and no-ELCA prior to PCB. Two serial angiographic follow-ups were planned for the patients (at 6–12 and 18–24 months after procedure). Acute procedural and follow-up angiographic results were assessed by quantitative coronary angiography. ELCA and no-ELCA group included 74 lesions and 92 lesions, respectively. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups in the clinical characteristics except the prevalence of hemodialysis, the rate of first-generation DES (37.9% vs 36.8%, p=0.897), previous stent size (2.90±0.39 mm vs 2.77±0.39 mm, p=0.063), and reference vessel diameter (2.65±0.46 mm vs 2.60±0.65 mm, p=0.593). Early follow-up angiography was performed in 66 lesions (89.1%) of ELCA group, and was done in 76 lesions (82.6%) of no-ELCA group. In the ELCA group, percentage diameter stenosis (%DS) just after procedure and at 6–12 months later were significantly smaller than those of no-ELCA group. Besides, target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate at 6–12 months after procedure was tended to be lower in the ELCA group. Late follow-up angiography was performed for 93 lesions (81.6%) of the remaining 114 lesions (excluding TLR lesion), late restenosis was found 9 lesions (18.6%) in the ELCA group and 11 lesions (24.4%) in the no-ELCA group (p=0.504). Late luminal loss was similar in both groups (0.37±0.71 mm vs 0.24±0.82 mm, p=0.438), and %DS at 12–18 months after revascularization was not different between the two groups. Changes of %DS and TLR rate Conclusions %DS in the ELCA group was smaller at just after procedure and the advantage was kept even after 1-year. However, late restenosis and TLR at 2-year after revascularization for DES-ISR could not be reduced by ELCA and PCB combination therapy.

Clinical Follow-up of Excimer Laser Coronary Angioplasty for In-stent Restenosis

1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 891
Author(s):  
Jin Ok Jeong ◽  
Hyeon Cheol Gwon ◽  
Sung Uk Kwon ◽  
Sung Yun Lee ◽  
Kyung Ju Ahn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Excimer Laser ◽  
Coronary Angioplasty ◽  
Stent Restenosis ◽  
In Stent Restenosis ◽  
Excimer Laser Coronary Angioplasty

scholarly journals The Predictors of Target Lesion Revascularization and Rate of In-Stent Restenosis in the Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Era

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Chengbin Zheng ◽  
Jeehoon Kang ◽  
Kyung Woo Park ◽  
Jung-Kyu Han ◽  
Han-Mo Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Target Lesion ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Target Lesion Revascularization ◽  
Drug Eluting Stent ◽  
2Nd Generation ◽  
Stent Restenosis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Drug Eluting ◽  
In Stent Restenosis

Objectives. The aim of our study was to investigate the predictors of target lesion revascularization (TLR) and to compare the in-stent restenosis (ISR) progression rates of different 2nd-generation drug-eluting stents (DES). Background. The predictors of early and late TLR after 2nd-generation DES implantation have not been fully evaluated. Methods. We analyzed 944 stented lesions from 394 patients who had at least two serial follow-up angiograms, using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) analysis. The study endpoints were TLR and the velocity of diameter stenosis (DS) progression. Results. TLR occurred in 58 lesions (6.1%) during the first angiographic follow-up period and 23 de novo lesions (2.4%) during the following second interval. Independent predictors for early TLR were diabetes mellitus (DM) (HR 2.58, 95% CI 1.29–5.15, p=0.007), previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (HR 2.41, 95% CI 1.03–5.65, p=0.043), and postprocedure DS% (HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.05–1.11, p<0.001, per 1%), while predictors of late TLR were previous PCI (HR 9.43, 95% CI 2.58-34.52, p=0.001) and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.28-2.00, p<0.001). The ISR progression velocity (by DS%) was 12.1 ±21.0%/year and 3.7 ±10.1%/year during the first and second follow-up periods, respectively, which had no significant difference (p>0.05) between the four types of DESs. Conclusions. Our data showed that predictors for TLR may be different at different time intervals. DM, pervious PCI, and postprocedure DS could predict early TLR, while previous PCI and CRP level could predict late TLR. Contemporary DESs had similar rates of ISR progression rates. Trial Registration. This study was retrospectively registered and approved by the institutional review board of Seoul National University Hospital (no. 1801–138-918).

Long-Term Follow-Up After Treatment of Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis and De Novo Lesions Using SeQuent Please Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Angiology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. 414-422
Author(s):  
Dai Zhang ◽  
Yan Sun ◽  
Xiaoli Liu ◽  
Fang Liu ◽  
Yujing Cheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
De Novo ◽  
Coronary Vessels ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Drug Eluting Stent ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Stent Restenosis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Drug Eluting

Managing patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains an important clinical challenge. In particular, large, randomized trials assessing the effect of drug-eluting balloons (DEB) in patients with de novo lesions are warranted. We investigated the effect of DEB on procedural complications, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in patients with drug-eluting stent ISR and de novo lesions. The clinical profiles of 238 consecutive patients treated for coronary ISR (n = 174) and de novo lesions (n = 64) using SeQuent Please paclitaxel-coated balloon were analyzed. Study end points were major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). At 1-year follow-up, TLR and MACEs occurred with acceptably low rates (5.0% and 6.3%, respectively). At 2.00 (0.74) years of follow-up, there was a significant difference in the rates of TLR between the ISR and the de novo lesions groups (14.4% [ISR] vs 3.1% [de novo], P = .028), and the occurrence of MACEs distinctly increased in the ISR group compared to the de novo lesions group (21.8% vs 6.2%, P = .009). The long-term outcomes of the ISR group were inferior to those of the de novo group (TLR, log-rank P = .019; MACEs, log-rank P = .010). Drug-eluting balloon for ISR and de novo lesions of small coronary vessels is effective and safe.

scholarly journals Late Restenosis After Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Occurs in Patients With Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis

2015 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seiji Habara ◽  
Kazushige Kadota ◽  
Takenobu Shimada ◽  
Masanobu Ohya ◽  
Hidewo Amano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Drug Eluting Stent ◽  
Stent Restenosis ◽  
Drug Eluting ◽  
Late Restenosis

scholarly journals Drug-Eluting Balloons versus Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents for Treating In-Stent Restenosis in Coronary Heart Disease after PCI: A Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Juan Xiu ◽  
Hai-Tao Yang ◽  
Ying-Ying Zheng ◽  
Yi-Tong Ma ◽  
Xiang Xie
Keyword(s):  
Observational Studies ◽  
Second Generation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Drug Eluting Stents ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Stent Restenosis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Drug Eluting ◽  
In Stent Restenosis

Background. In-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a common problem following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the best treatment strategy remains uncertain. There is some controversy over the efficacy of drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) and second-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) for treating ISR. Methods. A meta-analysis was used to compare the efficacy of the DEB and second-generation DES in the treatment of ISR. The primary endpoint is the incidence of target lesion revascularization (TLR). The secondary endpoint is the occurrence of target vessel revascularization (TVR), myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause death (ACM), cardiac death (CD), major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), minimum luminal diameter (MLD), late luminal loss (LLL), binary restenosis (BR), and percent diameter stenosis (DS%). Results. A total of 12 studies (4 randomized controlled trials and 8 observational studies) including 2020 patients with a follow-up of 6–25 months were included in the present study. There was a significant difference in the MLD between the two groups during follow-up (P=0.007, RR = 0.23, and 95% CI: 0.06–0.4 mm). There was no significant difference in LLL, BR, or DS% and the overall incidence of MACEs between the two groups. Subgroup analysis showed no significant difference in the incidence of primary and secondary endpoints when considering RCTs or observational studies only. Conclusions. The efficacy of the DEB and second-generation DES in the treatment of ISR is comparable. However, our results need further verification through multicenter randomized controlled trials.

P2806A novel sirolimus drug eluting stent for Small-Vessel Disease: results from en-ABL e-registry

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Testa ◽  
S Dani ◽  
D Desai ◽  
R Pandya ◽  
P Parekh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stent Thrombosis ◽  
Small Vessel Disease ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Small Vessel ◽  
Drug Eluting Stent ◽  
Vessel Disease ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Myocardial Infraction ◽  
Drug Eluting

Abstract Objective The aim of the study was to assess the clinical outcome of Abluminus DES in patients with small vessels. Background Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of small coronary vessel (≤2.75 mm) associated with more chances of restenosis and repeat revascularization even when drug eluting stent employed. Methods A total of 2,500 patients enrolled in en-ABL e-registry which is a prospective, multicentre observational post market registry. Out of 2,500 patients, 1,253 patients had small vessel (SV, ≤2.75 mm) while 1,247 had large vessel (LV, >3mm) disease. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) which is composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infraction (TV-MI) and target lesion/vessel revascularization (TLR) at 1 year follow up. The secondary endpoint were stent thrombosis and MACE up to 2 years. Results Baseline characteristics were well matched in both groups. In the SV group had higher prevalence of diabetes as compared to large vessel 43.0% vs 25.7%. Total 1,400 lesions treated with 1,612 Abluminus DES and 1,569 lesions treated with 1,675 Abluminus DES in SV and LV groups respectively. The mean diameter of stent was 2.61±0.23 and 3.3±0.3 mm in SV and LV groups respectively. There was a significant difference in MACE in treatment groups (3.7% vs. 1.4%, p=0.004 respectively) at 1 year. No significant differences were observed between SV and LV groups in terms of death/myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis. There were increment of only one TLR and no stent thrombosis reported at 2-year follow-up. Conclusion This result suggests the efficacy and safety of novel Abluminus DES in small vessel disease.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document