scholarly journals Managing common mental health problems: contrasting views of primary care physicians and psychiatrists

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 538-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Sing Sun ◽  
Tai Pong Lam ◽  
Kwok Fai Lam ◽  
Tak Lam Lo
PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. e0206440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angel O. Rojas Vistorte ◽  
Wagner Ribeiro ◽  
Carolina Ziebold ◽  
Elson Asevedo ◽  
Sara Evans-Lacko ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 183 (12) ◽  
pp. E959-E967 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. J. Kirmayer ◽  
L. Narasiah ◽  
M. Munoz ◽  
M. Rashid ◽  
A. G. Ryder ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Bristow ◽  
S. Edwards ◽  
E. Funnel ◽  
L. Fisher ◽  
L. Gask ◽  
...  

Background. In the UK, most people with mental health problems are managed in primary care. However, many individuals in need of help are not able to access care, either because it is not available, or because the individual's interaction with care-givers deters or diverts help-seeking. Aims. To understand the experience of seeking care for distress from the perspective of potential patients from “hard-to-reach” groups. Methods. A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews, analysed using a thematic framework. Results. Access to primary care is problematic in four main areas: how distress is conceptualised by individuals, the decision to seek help, barriers to help-seeking, and navigating and negotiating services. Conclusion. There are complex reasons why people from “hard-to-reach” groups may not conceptualise their distress as a biomedical problem. In addition, there are particular barriers to accessing primary care when distress is recognised by the person and help-seeking is attempted. We suggest how primary care could be more accessible to people from “hard-to-reach” groups including the need to offer a flexible, non-biomedical response to distress.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document