P–348 Laparoscopic radiofrequency thermal ablation for diffuse adenomyosis: symptomatology after a long-term follow-up

Study question Is conservative laparoscopic treatment with RFA (radiofrequency thermal ablation) related to a good outcome on a long-term follow-up? Summary answer RFA for diffuse adenomyosis was related to a good outcome on a long-term follow-up in terms of pain and ultrasonographic reduction. What is known already Uterine adenomyosis may cause symptoms refractory to medical treatment. New, uterine-sparing treatments have been introduced for patients who desire avoiding hysterectomy. Among surgical techniques used for this purpose, radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA) has been introduced, first for the treatment of uterine fibroids and then for focal adenomyosis. Diffuse adenomyosis is characterized by an extensive involvement of uterus, as on ultrasound less than 25% of the lesion is surrounded by healthy myometrium. It often leads to enhanced uterine volume, which presents soft consistence and globular aspect. Conservative treatment of diffuse adenomyosis is a real challenge. Study design, size, duration All consecutive patients who underwent RFA for diffuse adenomyosis in our institution between July 2011 and August 2017. Patients with focal adenomyosis were not included in the study. The treatment was reserved to selected patients who wanted to conserve the uterus and presented symptoms such as pain or abnormal uterine bleeding refractory to medical treatment. In all cases the treatment was performed by laparoscopy, which allowed for complete removal of extrauterine endometriosis, if associated. Participants/materials, setting, methods Nineteen patients (aged 33–49, mean 40) underwent radiofrequency thermal ablation for diffuse adenomyosis, and all of them completed the follow-up. Setting: referral center for endometriosis (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Minimally-Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy, Negrar). Follow-up consisted on ambulatory clinical evaluation with pelvic ultrasound and assessment of pain using the visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10 points for all pain components. Main results and the role of chance: Endometriosis was associated in12 cases, (63%) and in all cases was removed completely during surgery. The mean follow-up was 64 months (range 29–105). Abnormal uterine bleeding was present in 11 (60%) patients before the treatment and only in four of them (21%) during the follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative mean VAS score for dysmenorrea, dyspareunia, dyschezia and chronic pelvic pain was 6.95 vs 3.7, 4.1 vs 1.4, 3.7 vs 0.9 and 3.9 vs 1.5 respectively (p < 0.05 for all pain components). The reduction of adenomyosis on ultrasound was observed in 75% of cases. After surgery, two of four patients who desired pregnancy conceived, one of them delivered at term by caesarian section and one had an extrauterine pregnancy. Hysterectomy was performed in two cases during follow-up, at 35 and at 84 months after RFA. Limitations, reasons for caution The present study reports outcome in a limited population as the treatment was reserved to selected cases. The results, particularly regarding fertility and pregnancy outcome should be taken with caution because of small numbers. In our opinion for the moment the treatment should be performed in selected cases. Wider implications of the findings: The present treatment could be performed to avoid hysterectomy, as it was necessary only in two cases in our study. No cases of hysterectomy were reported within the first two years from surgery, so we can consider that RFA allows at least a temporary benefit on symptoms. Trial registration number Not applicable