When soft budget constraints promote innovation: Kornai meets Schumpeter in Japan

Author(s):  
Max Jerneck

Abstract The article examines János Kornai’s influential argument that “soft budget constraints” impede innovation, and finds that under certain conditions, they may promote it instead. Kornai’s concept is derived from his analysis of socialism. In capitalism, soft budget constraints can promote innovation if competition is enforced and finance is well regulated. This argument is developed using the same Schumpeterian foundation as Kornai, illustrated empirically with the case of innovation in post-war Japan. Implications are relevant for innovation and industrial policy in general.

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 338-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernesto Crivelli ◽  
Klaas Staal

2008 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evis Sinani ◽  
Derek C. Jones ◽  
Niels Mygind

By estimating stochastic frontiers we investigate the determinants and dynamics of firm efficiency. We use a representative sample of Estonian firms for the period 1993-1999 – and are able to address problems that plague much previous work, such as the endogeneity of ownership. Our main findings are that: (i) foreign ownership increases technical efficiency; (ii) firm size and higher labor quality enhance efficiency, while soft budget constraints adversely affect efficiency; (iv) Estonian firms operate under constants returns to scale; (v) the percentage of firms operating at high levels of efficiency increases over time. As such our findings provide support for hypotheses that a firm’s ownership structure and its characteristics such as firm size, labor quality, soft budget constraints and time of privatization are important for its technical efficiency.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document