Neoliberalism and industrial policy in Kosovo: the mining and metals industry in the post-war transition

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 482-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca J. Uberti
Keyword(s):  
2015 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-82
Author(s):  
Marta Czarnecka-Gallas

Abstract One of the most important tasks for Brazil after the Second World War was to change the structure of its economy. Due to a relatively low level of domestic industry, consecutive governments found industrialization the main priority and focused on industrial policy to foster that process. One can argue that industrial policy was the core element of Brazilian economic policy throughout the post-war period, until the liberalization reforms of the 1980 s. Political and economic traditions, together with rapid changes in global economy over the last decades, have had a huge impact on more recent Brazilian economic policy. On one hand, the country has kept looking back to the protectionist practices that have shaped its economy since the emergence of the modern Brazilian state, on the other, Brazil’s ambition is to become a leading emerging economy and serious partner in the developed world. A dual development track, and continuous inner-conflict between protectionism and liberalism, is clearly visible in Brazilian economic policy and often leads to contradictory measures being taken by successive governments. The objectives of the article is to provide a contextualized analysis of the evolution of Brazil’s economic growth strategy, with a particular focus on the role of economic and political traditions, and institutions.


1992 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 213-223
Author(s):  
Victoria Syme-Taylor

This paper looks at the difficulties experienced by both government and industry with the imposition of an accelerated defence programme in the early 1950’s. Shortages in manufacturing capacity, labour and resources forced government to interfere in industry at a time when it was believed that in order to regenerate Britain’s export potential industry had to be freed from the legacy of wartime controls. The impact was not, however, evenly spread but tended to cluster around the engineering industries. Apart from the obvious damage that this would cause to the export drive there was the added and less easily quantifiable problem that directing defence manufacturing to these industries rigidified a regional industrial structure despite government’s realisation of the need for a reevaluation of Britain’s industrial/regional heritage. This paper questions the thesis that the impact of the defence programme was marginal. While accepting the evidence that industry was at times reluctant to observe direction from Government and that indeed much of the programme was not fulfilled, examination of material from the government departments concerned with the programme shows that a confusion of aims may well have helped to undermine industry’s development in this crucial phase of post-war reconstruction.


1975 ◽  
pp. 235-249
Author(s):  
Bernard J. Smales
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
pp. 181-207
Author(s):  
Ben Fine ◽  
Zavareh Rustomjee
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Max Jerneck

Abstract The article examines János Kornai’s influential argument that “soft budget constraints” impede innovation, and finds that under certain conditions, they may promote it instead. Kornai’s concept is derived from his analysis of socialism. In capitalism, soft budget constraints can promote innovation if competition is enforced and finance is well regulated. This argument is developed using the same Schumpeterian foundation as Kornai, illustrated empirically with the case of innovation in post-war Japan. Implications are relevant for innovation and industrial policy in general.


1981 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Blais ◽  
Philippe Faucher

This article analyzes the principal features of industrial policy in the post-war advanced capitalist economies. Industrial policy is defined as a series of discriminatory measures developed by the state to promote industrial growth. Four main directions are outlined: increased financial aid to replace tariff protection; preference accorded to the more concentrated industries, particularly those related to, or in association with, national defense; new interest in the development of peripheral regions; and priority accorded to large corporations.A number of explanations are proposed for each of these main policies. The common thread running through them is the process of internationalization of production and trade liberalization. These lead each national economy to redefine its role in the global system. The analysis also underlines the ambivalent position of the state vis-à-vis a free market. Capitalist states rely upon the market to assure economic growth. The growth, nevertheless, is accompanied by regional and sectoral disequilibria which can reduce the political legitimacy of the state. This is why the state seeks to regulate growth, with a minimum of social conflict. State intervention is not designed solely to promote the interests of a class of large capitalists, but corresponds at the same time to the logic of capitalist accumulation and the requirements of political legitimacy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document