scholarly journals Crystal Bases of q-deformed Kac Modules Over the Quantum Superalgebra Uq(𝔤𝔩(m|n))

2012 ◽  
Vol 2014 (2) ◽  
pp. 512-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Hoon Kwon
2000 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 295-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgia Benkart ◽  
Seok-Jin Kang ◽  
Masaki Kashiwara

1991 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 923-930 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. P. Kulish
Keyword(s):  

2006 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong-Uy Shin
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 163 (3) ◽  
pp. 675-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.J. Kang ◽  
K.C. Misra
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Ben Brubaker ◽  
Daniel Bump ◽  
Solomon Friedberg

This chapter translates Statements A and B into Statements A′ and B′ in the language of crystal bases, and explains in this language how Statement B′ implies Statement A′. It first introduces the relevant definition, which is provisional since it assumes that we can give an appropriate definition of boxing and circling for Ω‎. The crystal graph formulation in Statement A′ is somewhat simpler than its Gelfand-Tsetlin counterpart. In particular, in the formulation of Statement A, there were two different Gelfand-Tsetlin patterns that were related by the Schützenberger involution. In the crystal graph formulation, different decompositions of the long element simply result in different paths from the same vertex v to the lowest weight vector.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document