scholarly journals Crystal Bases and Monomials forUq(G2)-Modules

2006 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong-Uy Shin
Keyword(s):  
1994 ◽  
Vol 163 (3) ◽  
pp. 675-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.J. Kang ◽  
K.C. Misra
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Ben Brubaker ◽  
Daniel Bump ◽  
Solomon Friedberg

This chapter translates Statements A and B into Statements A′ and B′ in the language of crystal bases, and explains in this language how Statement B′ implies Statement A′. It first introduces the relevant definition, which is provisional since it assumes that we can give an appropriate definition of boxing and circling for Ω‎. The crystal graph formulation in Statement A′ is somewhat simpler than its Gelfand-Tsetlin counterpart. In particular, in the formulation of Statement A, there were two different Gelfand-Tsetlin patterns that were related by the Schützenberger involution. In the crystal graph formulation, different decompositions of the long element simply result in different paths from the same vertex v to the lowest weight vector.


2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 895-925
Author(s):  
Craig Smith

Abstract The quantum co-ordinate algebra Aq(g) associated to a Kac–Moody Lie algebra g forms a Hopf algebra whose comodules are direct sums of finite-dimensional irreducible Uq(g) modules. In this paper, we investigate whether an analogous result is true when q=0. We classify crystal bases as coalgebras over a comonadic functor on the category of pointed sets and encode the monoidal structure of crystals into a bicomonadic structure. In doing this, we prove that there is no coalgebra in the category of pointed sets whose comodules are equivalent to crystal bases. We then construct a bialgebra over Z whose based comodules are equivalent to crystals, which we conjecture is linked to Lusztig’s quantum group at v=∞.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document