scholarly journals Operative approach to intestinal malrotation encountered during laparoscopic gastric bypass

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Shockcor ◽  
Rumbidzayi Nzara ◽  
Anam Pal ◽  
Emanuele Lo Menzo ◽  
Mark D Kligman

Abstract Congenital anomalies of midgut rotation are uncommon with a 0.2–0.5% incidence. Intestinal malrotation (IM) presents a unique challenge in bariatric surgery during laparoscopic gastric bypass (LRYGB), and familiarity with alternatives allows for safe laparoscopic intervention. IM was encountered in 5 of 1183 (0.4%) patients undergoing surgery. Once IM was suspected, a standardized approach was applied: rightward shift of ports, confirmation of IM by the absence of the ligament of Treitz, identification of the duodenojejunal junction, lysis of Ladd’s bands, mirror-image construction of the Roux limb and construction of the gastrojejunal anastomosis. Forty percent were male, age 33 ± 8 years, with body mass index 50 kg/m2 (37–75 kg/m2). IM was identified preoperatively in two patients (40%). All operations were completed laparoscopically. Despite the finding of IM, successful laparoscopic completion of gastric bypass can be anticipated if the surgeon has an understanding of the anatomic alterations and a strategy for intraoperative management.

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. S15-S16
Author(s):  
Zach Ichter ◽  
Lindsey Voller ◽  
Ovet Esparza ◽  
Dan Azagury ◽  
Homero Rivas ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
A. Campillo-Soto ◽  
J. A. Torralba-Martínez ◽  
J. G. Martín-Lorenzo ◽  
R. Lirón-Ruiz ◽  
M. Bento-Gerard ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 355-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy R. Shope ◽  
Robert N. Cooney ◽  
Janelle McLeod ◽  
Cynthia A. Miller ◽  
Randy S. Haluck

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vito De Blasi ◽  
Olivier Facy ◽  
Martine Goergen ◽  
Virginie Poulain ◽  
Luigi De Magistris ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 703-706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen E. Gibbs ◽  
Glenn J. Forrester ◽  
Pratibha Vemulapalli ◽  
Julio Teixeira

2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 1119-1122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron W. James ◽  
Rasa Zarnegar ◽  
Hisae Aoki ◽  
Guilherme M. Campos

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 802-806 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary A. Ichter ◽  
Lindsay Voeller ◽  
Homero Rivas ◽  
Habib Khoury ◽  
Dan Azagury ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Claudia BURES ◽  
Philippa SEIKA ◽  
Christian DENECKE ◽  
Johann PRATSCHKE ◽  
Ricardo ZORRON

ABSTRACT Background: In high-income countries, morbid obesity is a growing health problem that has already reached epidemic proportions. When performing a laparoscopic gastric bypass several operative methods exist. Aim: To describe the institutional experience using a knotless unidirectional barbed suture (V-Loc 180/Covidien, Mansfield, MA) to create a hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy (GJ) and jejunojejunostomy (JJ) during bariatric surgery. Methods: Evaluation of a case series of 87 morbidly obese patients who underwent laparoscopic gastric bypass with a hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy (GJA) and jejunojejunostomy (JJA) between 01/2015 and 06/2017. The patients were divided into two groups: in group I, GJA und JJA sutures were performed using the knotless unidirectional barbed suture; in group II, GJA and JJA were sutured with resorbable multifilament thread (Vicryl® 3/0 Ethicon, Livingstone, UK). The recorded data on gender, age, BMI, ASA score, operative time, postoperative morbidity, length of hospital stay, and reoperation, were analyzed and compared. Results: All procedures were completed laparoscopically with no mortality. The mean operative time was 123.23 (±30.631) in group I and 127.57 (±42.772) in group II (p<0.05). The postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the two groups. Early complications were observed for two patients (0.9%) in the barbed suture group and for one patient (0.42%) in the multifilament suture group (p<0.05). In group I two patients (0.9%) required reoperation: on the basis of jejunojejunal stenosis in one patient, and local abscess near the gastrojejunostomy, without a leakage, in the other. In group II one patient (0.42%) required reoperation due to stenosis of the GJA. The duration of hospital admission was similar for both groups: 3.36 (±0.743) days in group I vs. 3.38 (±1.058) days in group II (p<0.05). Conclusion: The novel anastomotic technique is a safe and effective method and can be applied to gastrojejunal anastomosis and jejunojejunal anastomosis in laparoscopic gastric bypass.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document