Minimally invasive endoscopic repair of atrial septal defects via right minithoracotomy

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. mmv042 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeevan Nagendran ◽  
Hamad F. Al Habib ◽  
Bob Kiaii ◽  
Michael W.A. Chu
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Endoscopic Repair ◽  
Septal Defects ◽  
Atrial Septal Defects

scholarly journals Minimally invasive or interventional repair of atrial septal defects in children: experience in 171 cases and comparison with conventional strategies

2001 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 1707-1712 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Formigari ◽  
Roberto M Di Donato ◽  
Ennio Mazzera ◽  
Adriano Carotti ◽  
Gabriele Rinelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Septal Defects ◽  
Atrial Septal Defects

scholarly journals MINIMALLY INVASIVE VIDEO ASSISTED SURGICAL CLOSURE OF ATRIAL SEPTAL DEFECTS: HASTENING RECOVERY USING A SAFE AND EFFECTIVE APPROACH

2013 ◽  
Vol 61 (10) ◽  
pp. E441
Author(s):  
Anna Sabate Rotes ◽  
Harold Burkhart ◽  
Rakesh Suri ◽  
Martha Grogan ◽  
Nathaniel Taggart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Surgical Closure ◽  
Septal Defects ◽  
Atrial Septal Defects ◽  
Video Assisted

scholarly journals Comparison of initial outcomes between minimally invasive right minithoracotomy and standard median sternotomy in patients undergoing isolated surgical closures of atrial septal defects.

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumsul Arif Mohammad Musa ◽  
Mauin Uddin ◽  
Syed Al Nahian ◽  
Mohammad Parvez Ahmed ◽  
Saikat Das Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Median Sternotomy ◽  
Septal Defects ◽  
Atrial Septal Defects

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Congenital Atrial Septal Defects vs. Catheter Based Device-Occlusion in Adults

2015 ◽  
Vol 63 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Schneeberger ◽  
A. Schaefer ◽  
J. Brickwedel ◽  
T. Deuse ◽  
H. Treede ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Septal Defects ◽  
Atrial Septal Defects

scholarly journals Minimally invasive surgery for atrial septal defects: a 20-year experience at a single centre

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 961-967 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimiro L Vida ◽  
Lorenza Zanotto ◽  
Lucia Zanotto ◽  
Chiara Tessari ◽  
Massimo A Padalino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Septal Defects ◽  
Atrial Septal Defects

Different approaches for minimally invasive closure of atrial septal defects

1999 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. 1648-1652 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jochen T Cremer ◽  
Andreas Böning ◽  
Marcel B Anssar ◽  
Peter Y Kim ◽  
Klaus Pethig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Septal Defects ◽  
Atrial Septal Defects

scholarly journals Minimally invasive versus transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Perfusion ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 026765912110219
Author(s):  
Esther Goh ◽  
Haya Mohammed ◽  
Mohammad Yusuf Salmasi ◽  
Samantha Ho ◽  
Umberto Benedetto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Transcatheter Closure ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Limited Data ◽  
Septal Defects ◽  
Atrial Septal Defects ◽  
Operative Outcomes ◽  
Asd Closure

Background: Limited data exists demonstrating the efficacy of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) compared to transcatheter (TC) closure of atrial septal defects (ASD). This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare post-operative outcomes of MIS versus TC repair in ASD closure. Methods: PubMed, Medline and EMBASE were searched from inception until June 2018 for randomised and observational studies comparing post-operative outcomes for MIS and TC repair. The studies were reviewed for bias using the ROBINS-I Score and pooled in a meta-analysis using STATA (version 15). Results: Six observational studies, involving 1524 patients assessing three primary and five secondary outcomes were included. Evidence suggests TC repair yielded shorter hospital stay (MD = 3.32, 95% CI 1.04–5.60) and lower rates of transient atrial fibrillation (AF) (RR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.20–1.15). TC repair patients also had fewer pericardial effusions (RR = 0.27, 95% CI 0.05–1.54, I2 = 0.0%) and pneumothoraxes (RR = 0.18, 95% CI 0.04–0.80, I2 = 0.0%). However, TC repair results in more minor residual shunts (RR = 6.04, 95% CI 1.69–21.63 in favour of MIS, I2 = 39.0%). No differences were found for incidences of strokes (RR = 1.58, 95% CI 0.23–10.91, I2 = 19.3%), unexpected bleeding (RR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.19–1.04, I2 = 0.0%) and blood transfusion (RR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.09–1.59, I2 = 0.0%). Conclusions: MIS closure for ASD has similar outcomes compared to TC repair. However, the lack of randomised literature related to MIS versus TC repair for ASD closure warrants further evidence in the form of RCTs to further support these findings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document