How Do Physical Therapists Measure Treatment Outcomes in Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain? A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 100 (6) ◽  
pp. 1020-1034 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diogo Pires ◽  
Eduardo Brazete Cruz ◽  
Luís A Gomes ◽  
Carla Nunes

Abstract Background There is an increasing recognition of the importance of using a conceptual framework covering the full range of relevant health domains and outcome measures addressed by physical therapy modalities in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, little is known about what outcome domains have been measured and through what measures in physical therapy research. Objective The purpose of this review was to synthesize outcome domains, instruments, and cutoff values reported in published randomized controlled trials and their compliance with the original Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) framework. Data sources Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database electronic databases were systematically searched from January 2008 to April 2019. Study selection Randomized controlled trials that compared physical therapy with any other intervention for adults with CLBP were included. Data extraction Study characteristics, outcome domains, instruments, and cutoff values were extracted by 2 reviewers. The PROMIS framework was used for domain categorization. Data synthesis One hundred ninety-five studies were included, with 52 outcome domains and 45 cutoff values identified from 182 instruments reported. Only 14 of 195 studies assessed all PROMIS health core areas, whereas the PROMIS physical health core area was assessed in all included studies. Pain intensity and disability were the most frequently used domains. Limitations Only studies for which full texts were available in English were included. Conclusions This review identified a poor overlap between the PROMIS framework and outcome domains used to define the effectiveness of physical therapy in adults with CLBP. This finding suggests that other potential benefits resulting from physical therapy modalities are not being measured. Furthermore, a large diversity in the outcome domains and instruments was found.

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 596-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuejie Li ◽  
Ying Yin ◽  
Gongwei Jia ◽  
Hong Chen ◽  
Lehua Yu ◽  
...  

Objective: To explore the effects of kinesiotape on pain and disability in individuals with chronic low back pain. Data sources: PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for English language publications from inception to 13 February 2018. Review methods: This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018089831). Our key search terms were ((kinesio taping) OR (kinesiotaping) OR (kinesiotape)) AND (low back pain). Randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of kinesiotape published in English language were included in this review. The reference lists of retrieved studies and relevant reviews were also searched. Quality of the included trials was assessed according to 2015 updated Cochrane Back and Neck Review Group 13-Item criteria. Results: A total of 10 articles were included in this meta-analysis. A total of 627 participants were involved, with 317 in the kinesiotape group and 310 in the control group. The effects of kinesiotape on pain and disability were explored. While kinesiotape was not superior to placebo taping in pain reduction, either alone ( P = 0.07) or in conjunction with physical therapy ( P = 0.08), it could significantly improve disability when compared to the placebo taping ( P < 0.05). Conclusion: Since kinesiotape is convenient for application, it could be used for individuals with chronic low back pain in some cases, especially when the patients could not get other physical therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document