scholarly journals Effect of methionine supplementation and wheat pasture maturity on forage intake and digestion characteristics of cows grazing winter wheat pasture

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_S1) ◽  
pp. S92-S95
Author(s):  
Ulises A Sanchez-Sandoval ◽  
Jesus Joaquin Figueroa-Zamudio ◽  
Brandon G Smythe ◽  
Sergio A Soto-Navarro
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S112-S116
Author(s):  
Ulises A Sánchez-Sandoval ◽  
Jorge A Rodela ◽  
Jesus J Figueroa-Zamudio ◽  
Susana Urias ◽  
Sergio A Soto-Navarro

1990 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 1139-1150 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. E. Branine ◽  
M. L. Galyean

Abstract Three 10-d collection periods (April 4 to 14, early April, EApr; April 23 to May 3, late April, LApr; May 10 to 20, 1984, mid-May, MMay) were conducted to evaluate effects of no supplement (C), .5 kg·head−1·d−1 (as-fed basis) supplemental grain (steam-flaked milo, G) or G plus 170 mg monensin·headhead−1·d−1 (M) on forage intake and digestion by 12 ruminally cannulated beef steers (four/treatment; avg initially BW = 393 kg) grazing irrigated winter wheat pasture. Ruminal pH was greater (P < .01) for M than for C or G during EApr but was not altered by treatments in LApr or MMay. Compared with C, ruminal NH3 was decreased (P < .10) by G and M (5 h after supplementation) in EApr, decreased (P < .05) by G (2h) and increased (P < .05) by M (8 h) in LApr and decreased (P < .10) by G (−1h) in MMay. Treatments had little influence on total VFA concentrations or on molar proportions of acetate and propionate. Butyrate molar proportion was decreased (P < .10) by M during EApr and LApr, but not during MMay. Monensin increased (P < .05) fluid passage rate compared with C and G in EApr but not in other periods. Particulate passage measurements did not differ (P > .10) among treatments within periods. Forage DM intake was not influenced (P > .10) by supplementation during any period. Extent of in situ forage DM disappearance was greater (P < .10) for M than for C or G during EApr (12 and 30 h of incubation) but was not different (P > .10) in LApr or MMay. Incidence of frothy bloat was decreased (P < .05) by M during EApr; this reduction may have been related to effects of M on ruminal pH, forage digestion and fluid passage.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1664-1668
Author(s):  
Susana Urias ◽  
Ulises A Sánchez-Sandoval ◽  
Jesus J Figueroa-Zamudio ◽  
Jorge A Rodela ◽  
Sergio A Soto-Navarro

1981 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 447-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. W. Horn ◽  
T. L. Mader ◽  
S. L. Armbruster ◽  
R. R. Frahm

2003 ◽  
Vol 81 (12) ◽  
pp. 3191-3201 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. T. Choat ◽  
C. R. Krehbiel ◽  
G. C. Duff ◽  
R. E. Kirksey ◽  
L. M. Lauriault ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Gerry L. Kuhl ◽  
G.E. Jr. LeValley ◽  
G.D. McCormack ◽  
Dale A. Blasi ◽  
James S. Drouillard ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 172-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nouhoun Coulibaly ◽  
Daniel J. Bernardo ◽  
Gerald W. Horn

AbstractEnergy supplementation provides a means of reducing production risk of growing stocker cattle on winter wheat pasture. This study addresses the issue of risk aversion and energy supplement input use. Differences in supplementation practices induced by risk aversion and the effects of cattle and feed market conditions are examined. Results show that supplementation practices are likely to be similar across producers, irrespective of their risk attitudes. Cattle and feed market conditions, however, markedly affect supplementation practices. These findings provide information for assisting stockmen in identifying efficient supplementation strategies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document