scholarly journals THORATEC RIGHT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE WITH CONCURRENT HEARTMATE XVE LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE: LONG-TERM OUTPATIENT MANAGEMENT

ASAIO Journal ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 44A
Author(s):  
K McCloy ◽  
A Healy ◽  
W Perry ◽  
A Eccles ◽  
S Clayson ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 176-182
Author(s):  
Sinan Sabit Kocabeyoglu ◽  
Umit Kervan ◽  
Dogan Emre Sert ◽  
Mehmet Karahan ◽  
Emre Aygun ◽  
...  

Abstract OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to examine the haemodynamic effects of preoperative levosimendan infusion in patients who underwent left ventricular assist device implantation and evaluate the prognoses. METHODS Between May 2013 and October 2018, 85 adult patients who underwent left ventricular assist device implantation were included; 44 and 41 patients suffered from dilated cardiomyopathy and ischaemic cardiomyopathy, respectively. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group A (58 patients) included those who received levosimendan infusion in addition to other inotropes and group B (27 patients) included those who received inotropic agents other than levosimendan. Levosimendan infusion was started at a dose of 0.1 µg⋅kg−1⋅min−1 for a maximum of 48 h without a bolus. The primary outcome was early right ventricular failure (RVF). The secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, need for right ventricular assist device, late RVF and recovery of end-organ functions. The safety end points of levosimendan included hypotension, atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation and resuscitated cardiac arrest. RESULTS Patient characteristics were similar in both groups. No significant differences between groups were observed in the rates of early mortality, RVF, need for right ventricular assist device, cardiopulmonary bypass time and intensive care unit stay. Survival rates at 30 days, 1 year and 3 years and freedom from late RVF were similar between the groups. Administration of levosimendan was safe, generally well-tolerated and not interrupted because of side effects. CONCLUSIONS Levosimendan therapy was well-tolerated in patients who received permanent left ventricular assist devices. Combined preoperative therapy with inotropes and levosimendan significantly improves end-organ functions.


2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew C.W. Baldwin ◽  
Elena Sandoval ◽  
William E. Cohn ◽  
Hari R. Mallidi ◽  
Jeffrey A. Morgan ◽  
...  

Although biventricular heart failure has been successfully managed with dual continuous-flow ventricular assist devices, the long-term use of 2 mechanically dissimilar pumps has traditionally been discouraged. We present the case of a 52-year-old man whose treatment with a HeartMate II left ventricular assist device was complicated by right ventricular failure, necessitating the implantation of a long-term right ventricular assist device. A HeartWare left ventricular assist device was placed along the right ventricular base to avoid interference with the HeartMate II housing. The patient was discharged from the hospital after routine postoperative care and dual-device training. This case shows that, despite logistical complexities, nonidentical continuous-flow device pairings can successfully provide long-term biventricular support.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document