Biomechanical Study of Tibialis Anterior Tendon Transfer

1998 ◽  
Vol 349 ◽  
pp. 249-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. H. P. Hui ◽  
J. C. H. Goh ◽  
E. H. Lee
2019 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Osman Nuri Özyalvaç ◽  
Akay Kırat ◽  
Evren Akpınar ◽  
Yaşar Mahsut Dinçel ◽  
Barış Özkul ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. 641-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin W. Fennell ◽  
John M. Ballard ◽  
Daniel S. Pflaster ◽  
Rodney H. Adkins

A multiphase biomechanical study was performed using human tibialis anterior tendons and cuboid bones, comparing the fixation of the tendon to the bone using bone anchors and bone tunnels. Twenty-six specimens were tested for ultimate load to failure comparing Mitek Superanchor fixation with no. 1 and no. 5 braided polyethelyne suture to bone tunnel fixation. Mitek Superanchor with no. 5 suture failed at 223 N, compared with Mitek Superanchor with no. 1 suture at 134 N and bone tunnel at 143 N ( P = 0.033). Mitek with no. 1 suture versus bone tunnel was not significantly different. The Mitek with no. 5 suture failed at the tendon/suture interface (75%), the Mitek with no. 1 suture failed at the suture/anchor interface (56%), and bone tunnel fixation failed most commonly by fracture of the tunnel (76%). This study is the first biomechanical analysis of the pullout strengths of bone tunnels or suture anchors in the cuboid bone. We have shown that the suture anchor has a pullout strength comparable or superior to a conventional bone tunnel in an in vitro situation. We believe it is a viable alternative to fixation of the tibialis anterior tendon to the cuboid when there is insufficient tendon length or failure of the bone tunnel.


2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. e16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua B. Holt ◽  
Brian Westerlind ◽  
Jose A. Morcuende

2013 ◽  
Vol 472 (2) ◽  
pp. 750-758 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly Gray ◽  
Joshua Burns ◽  
David Little ◽  
Michael Bellemore ◽  
Paul Gibbons

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document