THE BEHAVIOR OF MALE SKIN GRAFTS IN ISOGENIC POSTPARTUM FEMALE MICE

1973 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 570
Author(s):  
J. JEEKEL
Keyword(s):  
1979 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 116
Author(s):  
Saiichirou Seo ◽  
Junzo Yasuhara ◽  
Kiyomi Saeki
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 111 (9) ◽  
pp. 3502-3507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe Bourdeaux ◽  
Christophe Lurquin ◽  
Isabelle Jacquemart ◽  
Bernard Lethé ◽  
Francis Brasseur ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 169 (5) ◽  
pp. 1829-1833
Author(s):  
E S De Pirro ◽  
E H Goldberg

The ability of female mice to reject H-Y-incompatible, but otherwise histocompatible, male skin grafts differs greatly from strain to strain, as is illustrated particularly by the C57BL strain (B6 and other sublines), termed "H-Y rejector," because females invariably and promptly reject C57BL male skin, in comparison with the C3H strain, termed "H-Y nonrejector," because females characteristically accept male C3H skin. To assess the extent to which the thymus governs this rejector vs. nonrejector status, two studies were made. In the first, lethally irradiated B6 (C57BL) and C3H females were restored with (B6 X C3H)F1 female cells, providing a graft-vs.-host-free milieu for differentiation of the same immunopoietic cell population in B6 vs. C3H hosts. With respect to (B6 X C3H)F1 male skin grafts, B6 hosts responded as rejectors and C3H hosts as nonrejectors, signifying that rejector vs. nonrejector status was determined by the host during immunopoiesis. That the main organ responsible for rejector vs. nonrejector determination is the thymus was shown in a second study. Previously thymectomized (B6 X C3H)F1 females received a histocompatible graft of thymus from either B6 or C3H neonatal females and were restored with donor-marked (B6-Ly-5a X C3H)F1 female cells after lethal irradiation. With respect to (B6 X C3H)F1 male skin grafts, the recipients of B6 thymus grafts responded generally as rejectors and the recipients of C3H thymus grafts responded uniformly as nonrejectors.


Ensho ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 497-501
Author(s):  
Saiichirou Seo ◽  
Kiyomi Saeki
Keyword(s):  

1979 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 344-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saiichirou Seo ◽  
Junzo Yasuhara ◽  
Kiyomi Saeki
Keyword(s):  

Science ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 200 (4339) ◽  
pp. 320-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Coons ◽  
E. Goldberg
Keyword(s):  

1981 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen H. Goldberg ◽  
Gideon Goldstein ◽  
Edward A. Boyse ◽  
Margrit P. Scheid
Keyword(s):  

1968 ◽  
Vol 128 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Willys K. Silvers

In contrast to the uniform rejection of adult male skin isografts by C57BL/6 females, neonatal male skin isografts are frequently accepted. Moreover, 50% of all females which accept a neonatal male skin graft for 50 days accept a subsequent adult male skin graft as well. This ability of neonatal skin to produce tolerance has been investigated under a variety of experimental conditions. The results indicate: (a) Even when a newborn male skin graft is transplanted concomitantly with an adult graft, it can produce tolerance of the latter although it is less effective in this regard than when transplanted beforehand. (b) The continued exposure of the host to the newborn graft is vitally important in maintaining the unresponsive state; and most females deprived of these grafts for 50 days manifest an immune response when challenged with adult male skin. (c) Newborn male skin isografts raised on adult females are not as antigenic as normal male skin grafts. (d) Occasionally, even a presensitized female can be rendered tolerant by grafting with neonatal male skin. (e) Neonatal male skin grafts are not accepted when transplanted to the spleens of adult females although they may occasionally induce tolerance of a subsequent orthotopic adult male skin graft. The failure of these intrasplenic grafts to survive can be attributed at least partly to their small size since orthotopic grafts of comparable size usually do not survive. (f) Females bearing neonatal male skin grafts are not perceptible cellular chimeras. Because the unresponsive condition induced with neonatal skin is similar to that which results from multiparity, this latter condition has also received attention. In this regard it has been established that unlike the removal of a neonatal male skin isograft, the delayed grafting of isolated females with a previous history of multiparity does not result in many of them manifesting what may be considered an immune response. However, this delay in grafting does seem to impair the tolerance multiparity produces. The results are discussed in relation to other methods of producing tolerance in adult animals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document